Becoming an ESL Researcher: A Personal Monologue
This reflective paper narrates my research journey from a naïve researcher to a critic and from a behaviorist to a post-structuralist. It highlights the different philosophical, methodological, and theoretical dilemmas I faced in conceptualizing students' experiences in an English as a Second...
Αποθηκεύτηκε σε:
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
---|---|
Μορφή: | Βιβλίο |
Έκδοση: |
National Research University Higher School of Economics,
2021-03-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Θέματα: | |
Διαθέσιμο Online: | Connect to this object online. |
Ετικέτες: |
Προσθήκη ετικέτας
Δεν υπάρχουν, Καταχωρήστε ετικέτα πρώτοι!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_5bd7d35ca1e5428ea3d1d902316fb2c4 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Irfan Ahmed Rind |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Becoming an ESL Researcher: A Personal Monologue |
260 | |b National Research University Higher School of Economics, |c 2021-03-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.10298 | ||
500 | |a 2411-7390 | ||
520 | |a This reflective paper narrates my research journey from a naïve researcher to a critic and from a behaviorist to a post-structuralist. It highlights the different philosophical, methodological, and theoretical dilemmas I faced in conceptualizing students' experiences in an English as a Second Language program in higher education during my doctoral studies. This journey is divided into three phases: construction, deconstruction, and reconstruction. In the construction phase, I conceptualized students' experiences from my own established knowledge, which was grounded in my presumptions about teaching and learning. During the deconstruction phase, I questioned my understanding of knowledge and social realities. In the reconstruction phase, I interacted with Phenomenography, Activity Theory, Symbolic Interactionism, Communities of Practice, and Bourdieusian Structuralism. This paper narrates these interactions, focusing mainly on the dilemmas I faced as a researcher. These reflections could be highly beneficial for new researchers who may face the same situations at different stages of their research careers. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a reflexivity | ||
690 | |a self-conversation | ||
690 | |a qualitative research | ||
690 | |a philosophical stance | ||
690 | |a social stance | ||
690 | |a novice researchers | ||
690 | |a Education | ||
690 | |a L | ||
690 | |a Philology. Linguistics | ||
690 | |a P1-1091 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Journal of Language and Education, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 219-228 (2021) | |
787 | 0 | |n https://jle.hse.ru/article/view/10298/12745 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2411-7390 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/5bd7d35ca1e5428ea3d1d902316fb2c4 |z Connect to this object online. |