Do Women have Adequate Knowledge about Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions? A Systematic Review

Abstract Objective We sought to investigate whether women present adequate knowledge of the main pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) (urinary incontinence - UI, fecal incontinence - FI, and pelvic organ prolapse - POP). Data sources A systematic review was performed in the MEDLINE, PEDro, CENTRAL, and Coc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Júlia Ferreira Fante (Author), Thais Daniel Silva (Author), Elaine Cristine Lemes Mateus-Vasconcelos (Author), Cristine Homsi Jorge Ferreira (Author), Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 2019-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_5ec2838b412b445e8b51ba13963512cd
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Júlia Ferreira Fante  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Thais Daniel Silva  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Elaine Cristine Lemes Mateus-Vasconcelos  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Cristine Homsi Jorge Ferreira  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Do Women have Adequate Knowledge about Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions? A Systematic Review 
260 |b Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia,   |c 2019-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0100-7203 
500 |a 10.1055/s-0039-1695002 
520 |a Abstract Objective We sought to investigate whether women present adequate knowledge of the main pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) (urinary incontinence - UI, fecal incontinence - FI, and pelvic organ prolapse - POP). Data sources A systematic review was performed in the MEDLINE, PEDro, CENTRAL, and Cochrane databases for publications from inception to April 2018. Selection of studies A total of 3,125 studies were reviewed. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the heterogeneity of primary outcomes and the diversity of instruments for measuring knowledge. The quality of the articles included in the analysis was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) adapted for cross-sectional studies. Data collection Two authors performed data extraction into a standardized spreadsheet. Data synthesis Nineteen studies were included, comprising 11,512 women. About the methodological quality (NOS), most of the studies (n= 11) presented a total score of 6 out of 10. Validated questionnaires and designed pilot-tested forms were the most frequently used ways of assessing knowledge. Some studies were stratified by race, age, or group minorities. The most used questionnaire was the prolapse and incontinence knowledge questionnaire (PIKQ) (n= 5). Knowledge and/or awareness regarding PFD was low to moderate among the studies. Urinary incontinence was the most prevalent PFD investigated, and the most important risk factors associated with the lack of knowledge of the pelvic floor were: African-American ethnicity (n= 3), low educational level (n= 4), low access to information (n= 5) and socioeconomic status (n= 3). Conclusion Most women have a gap in the knowledge of pelvic floor muscle dysfunctions, do not understand their treatment options, and are not able to identify risk factors for these disorders. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a PT 
690 |a knowledge 
690 |a pelvic floor 
690 |a urinary incontinence 
690 |a systematic review 
690 |a Gynecology and obstetrics 
690 |a RG1-991 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Vol 41, Iss 8, Pp 508-519 (2019) 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032019000800508&tlng=en 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbgo/v41n8/1806-9339-rbgo-41-08-508.pdf 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0100-7203 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/5ec2838b412b445e8b51ba13963512cd  |z Connect to this object online.