Walking Ankle Biomechanics of Individuals With Transtibial Amputations Using a Prescribed Prosthesis and a Portable Bionic Prosthesis Under Myoelectric Control

• Main Authors: Nicole E. Stafford (Author), Eddie B. Gonzalez (Author), Daniel P. Ferris (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: IEEE, 2024-01-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.

Summary

Individuals with transtibial amputation can activate residual limb muscles to volitionally control robotic ankle prostheses for walking and postural control. Most continuous myoelectric ankle prostheses have used a tethered, pneumatic device. The Open Source Leg allows for myoelectric control on an untethered electromechanically actuated ankle. To evaluate continuous proportional myoelectric control on the Open Source Ankle, we recruited five individuals with transtibial amputation. Participants walked over ground with an experimental powered prosthesis and their prescribed passive prosthesis before and after multiple powered device practice sessions. Participants averaged five hours of total walking time. After the final testing session, participants indicated their prosthesis preference via questionnaire. Participants tended to increase peak ankle power after practice (powered <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.80~\pm ~1.02$ </tex-math></inline-formula> W/kg and passive <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.39~\pm ~0.31$ </tex-math></inline-formula> W/kg). Additionally, participants tended to generate greater ankle work with the powered prosthesis compared to their passive device (<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.13~\pm $ </tex-math></inline-formula>.15 J/kg increase). Although work and peak power generation were not statistically different between the two prostheses, participants preferred walking with the prosthesis under myoelectric control compared to the passive prosthesis. These results indicate individuals with transtibial amputation learned to walk with an untethered powered prosthesis under continuous myoelectric control. Four out 5 participants generated larger magnitudes in peak power compared to their passive prosthesis after practice sessions. An additional important finding was participants chose to walk with peak ankle powers about half of what the powered prosthesis was capable of based on mechanical testing.

Item Description

1534-4320
1558-0210
10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3440257