Effect of dynamic cyclic loading on screw loosening of retightened versus new abutment screw in both narrow and standard implants (in-vitro study)

Abstract Background The purpose of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the effect of dynamic cyclic loading on screw loosening of retightened abutment screw versus new abutment screw in both narrow and standard implants. Methods Separate acrylic resin blocks containing implant assembly (fixture, abu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eman Mohammed Nasr Attiah (Author), Attiah Ali AlGendy (Author), Tamer Mohamed Nasr Mostafa (Author)
Format: Book
Published: SpringerOpen, 2020-07-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_5fb6e2ffd0b34c09acba828b3796b32c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Eman Mohammed Nasr Attiah  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Attiah Ali AlGendy  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Tamer Mohamed Nasr Mostafa  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Effect of dynamic cyclic loading on screw loosening of retightened versus new abutment screw in both narrow and standard implants (in-vitro study) 
260 |b SpringerOpen,   |c 2020-07-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s40729-020-00229-3 
500 |a 2198-4034 
520 |a Abstract Background The purpose of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the effect of dynamic cyclic loading on screw loosening of retightened abutment screw versus new abutment screw in both narrow and standard implants. Methods Separate acrylic resin blocks containing implant assembly (fixture, abutment, abutment screw, metal tube capping the abutment). Samples were divided into two main groups according to the diameter of implant: group 1 (GI 4.5-mm diameter) and group 2 (GII 3-mm diameter). Each group is subdivided into two subgroups according to the suggested option to manage screw loosening either by retightening (GIA, GIIA) or using new screws (GIB, GIIB). One hundred thousand cycles of eccentric dynamic cyclic loading (DCL) were applied before and after retightening or replacing the screw; then, removal torque loss (RTL) ratio was calculated, tabulated, and analyzed by t-student, ANOVA, pair wise Tukey's tests. Results There were differences between GI and GII regarding the incidence of screw loosening process. Removal torque loss ratio was higher in GIB and GIIB where the old abutment screws were replaced by new screws for both standard implants (SIs) and narrow diameter implants (NDIs). There was significant effect of retightening and replacing the abutment screws after exposure to DCL. Conclusions Within the limitations of this in-vitro study, it can be conclude that screw loosening process occurred in both SIs and NDIs but with higher values in NDIs. It is better to retighten the screw of NDIs and SIs than replacing it with a new screw. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Dynamic cyclic loading DCL 
690 |a Removal torque loss RTL 
690 |a Retightening 
690 |a Screw loosening 
690 |a Medicine 
690 |a R 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n International Journal of Implant Dentistry, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2020) 
787 0 |n http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40729-020-00229-3 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2198-4034 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/5fb6e2ffd0b34c09acba828b3796b32c  |z Connect to this object online.