The 2009 Claremont Debates: The Promise and Pitfalls of Utilization-Focused and Empowerment Evaluation
Background: Hundreds of evaluators visit the Claremont Colleges in southern California each year to discuss a wide range of topics related to improving the quality of evaluation practice. Debates between thought leaders in the field have been one of the most popular and informative ways to advance u...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Stewart I. Donaldson (Author), Michael Q. Patton (Author), David M. Fetterman (Author), Michael Scriven (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
The Evaluation Center at Western Michigan University,
2010-02-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Comments on the 2009 Claremont Debates on "The Promise and Pitfalls of Utilization-Focused and Empowerment Evaluation" Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation Vol. 6, No. 13 (2010)
by: Hellmut W. Eggers
Published: (2010) -
The 2009 Claremont Debates-Appendix A: David Fetterman's PowerPoint Slides
by: David M. Fetterman
Published: (2010) -
The 2004 Claremont Debate: Lipsey vs. Scriven
by: Stewart I. Donaldson, et al.
Published: (2005) -
Conducting Research on Visual Design and Learning: Pitfalls and Promises
by: Heather Kanuka, et al.
Published: (1999) -
The Promise and Pitfalls of Self-report
by: Luke K. Fryer, et al.
Published: (2020)