A quantitative approach to evaluate image quality of whole slide imaging scanners

Context: The quality of images produced by whole slide imaging (WSI) scanners has a direct influence on the readers' performance and reliability of the clinical diagnosis. Therefore, WSI scanners should produce not only high quality but also consistent quality images. Aim: We aim to evaluate re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Prarthana Shrestha (Author), R Kneepkens (Author), J Vrijnsen (Author), D Vossen (Author), E Abels (Author), B Hulsken (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_630a661d8fb345c1af896935acf0f7bf
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Prarthana Shrestha  |e author 
700 1 0 |a R Kneepkens  |e author 
700 1 0 |a J Vrijnsen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a D Vossen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a E Abels  |e author 
700 1 0 |a B Hulsken  |e author 
245 0 0 |a A quantitative approach to evaluate image quality of whole slide imaging scanners 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2153-3539 
500 |a 2153-3539 
500 |a 10.4103/2153-3539.197205 
520 |a Context: The quality of images produced by whole slide imaging (WSI) scanners has a direct influence on the readers' performance and reliability of the clinical diagnosis. Therefore, WSI scanners should produce not only high quality but also consistent quality images. Aim: We aim to evaluate reproducibility of WSI scanners based on the quality of images produced over time and among multiple scanners. The evaluation is independent of content or context of test specimen. Methods: The ultimate judge of image quality is a pathologist, however, subjective evaluations are heavily influenced by the complexity of a case and subtle variations introduced by a scanner can be easily overlooked. Therefore, we employed a quantitative image quality assessment method based on clinically relevant parameters, such as sharpness and brightness, acquired in a survey of pathologists. The acceptable level of quality per parameter was determined in a subjective study. The evaluation of scanner reproducibility was conducted with Philips Ultra-Fast Scanners. A set of 36 HercepTest™ slides were used in three substudies addressing variations due to systems and time, producing 8640 test images for evaluation. Results: The results showed that the majority of images in all the substudies are within the acceptable quality level; however, some scanners produce higher quality images more often than others. The results are independent of case types, and they match our perception of quality. Conclusion: The quantitative image quality assessment method was successfully applied in the HercepTest™ slides to evaluate WSI scanner reproducibility. The proposed method is generic and applicable to any other types of slide stains and scanners. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Quantitative image quality 
690 |a scanner quality 
690 |a subjective image quality 
690 |a Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics 
690 |a R858-859.7 
690 |a Pathology 
690 |a RB1-214 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Pathology Informatics, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 56-56 (2016) 
787 0 |n http://www.jpathinformatics.org/article.asp?issn=2153-3539;year=2016;volume=7;issue=1;spage=56;epage=56;aulast=Shrestha 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2153-3539 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2153-3539 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/630a661d8fb345c1af896935acf0f7bf  |z Connect to this object online.