Improving Immunization Rates During the 2019 Measles Outbreak

• Main Authors: Steven Louis Rosas (Author), Henry J. Simpson (Author), Christopher Martinez (Author), James A. Walker (Author), Jeremy Forster (Author), Mark Deyo-Svendsen (Author), Michael Phillips (Author), Kaylie Evers (Author)
• פורמט: ספר
• יצא לאור: SAGE Publishing, 2022-02-01T00:00:00Z.
• נושאים: article
• גישה מקוונת: Connect to this object online.
• Notes: 2150-1327; 10.1177/21501319211069271
• Keywords: Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics; R858-859.7; Public aspects of medicine; RA1-1270
• Source: Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, Vol 13 (2022)

In 2019, there were multiple outbreaks of measles in the United States. In the context of the public awareness of these outbreaks, we performed an intervention with the intent to improve the rate of measles immunization in our pediatric population. Pediatric patients that were lacking adequate measles immunization were identified by electronic medical record (EMR) survey. Charts were reviewed and updated if records were found to be incomplete. Parents of the remaining children were sent a letter, personally signed by the child's primary care provider, encouraging measles immunization. A measles fact sheet, produced by the United States Center for Disease Control, was also included with the letter. There were 44 patients in the study group whose parents received a letter and measles fact sheet. As a result, 5 of these children were brought in for a measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) immunization. The 44 patients whose parents received a letter included 20 patients whose parents had previously expressed intent to not vaccinate their children as documented in the EMR. None of these children received an MMR immunization. Although small in scope, this project provides a glimpse into the importance of personal provider guidance to parents who are inclined to immunize their children. Unfortunately, it also demonstrated that provider advice did not change the opinions of parents who had already taken a stance against vaccination, even in the context of an urgent public health situation that had garnered widespread coverage in the lay press and social media.