Advancement of life and death education research: recommending implementation of the Life + Death Education Framework for teaching and research purposes

Life and death education is a distinct field of study that has potential practicality and life relevance for us to consider. For example, one notable inquiry pertaining to life education teaching entails appreciation and theoretical understanding of quality life functioning (e.g., a person's de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huy P. Phan (Author), Bing Hiong Ngu (Author), Chao-Sheng Hsu (Author), Si-Chi Chen (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2024-11-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_641c09aaada2437e8f6469ecef9f1a93
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Huy P. Phan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Huy P. Phan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Bing Hiong Ngu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Chao-Sheng Hsu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Si-Chi Chen  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Advancement of life and death education research: recommending implementation of the Life + Death Education Framework for teaching and research purposes 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2024-11-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2296-2565 
500 |a 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1440750 
520 |a Life and death education is a distinct field of study that has potential practicality and life relevance for us to consider. For example, one notable inquiry pertaining to life education teaching entails appreciation and theoretical understanding of quality life functioning (e.g., a person's desire to attain spiritual wisdom vs. a person's desire to attain immense financial wealth). Our research undertakings recently involved the development of a blueprint or framework, which we termed as the 'Life + Death Education Framework'. This framework is intended to provide relevant information that may serve to assist educators, stakeholders, caregivers, etc. with their teaching practices of life and death education. We premise that to date, there is no clear consensus or agreement among educators as to what one is expected (e.g., specific learning outcome) to teach to students who wish to study and learn about life and death education (e.g., do we introduce to students the metaphysical lens about death?). Moreover, from our point of view, the Life + Death Education Framework may yield insightful guidelines and life-related benefits, such as the heightening of a person's well-being and/or his or her daily life functioning. As such, then, the focus of the present theoretical-conceptual article is for us to provide an in-depth narrative of the Life + Death Education Framework and how this framework, or potential universal blueprint, could help introduce and clarify our proposition of a life functioning-related concept known as 'self well-being'. Self well-being, for us, is an alternative nomenclature that may be used in place of subjective well-being. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Life + Death Education Framework 
690 |a life care 
690 |a life enhancement 
690 |a self well-being 
690 |a positive psychological personal 
690 |a life education 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontiers in Public Health, Vol 12 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1440750/full 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2296-2565 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/641c09aaada2437e8f6469ecef9f1a93  |z Connect to this object online.