Effects of radio-opacifier addition in dental impression material

<b>Objective: </b> The aim of this <i>in vitro</i> study was to determine the effects of barium sulfate addition in two dental impression materials previously proved as radiolucent. <b> Materials and Methods: </b> An irreversible hydrocolloid (IH) and polyether (P...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mota Eduardo (Author), Rigo Angela (Author), Rockenbach Maria (Author), da Costa Nilza (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2010-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_644675558f2c4d8c8b0e4b69d78bbb41
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Mota Eduardo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rigo Angela  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rockenbach Maria  |e author 
700 1 0 |a da Costa Nilza  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Effects of radio-opacifier addition in dental impression material 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2010-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0970-9290 
500 |a 1998-3603 
520 |a <b>Objective: </b> The aim of this <i>in vitro</i> study was to determine the effects of barium sulfate addition in two dental impression materials previously proved as radiolucent. <b> Materials and Methods: </b> An irreversible hydrocolloid (IH) and polyether (PE) were tested for optical density, linear dimension stability and detail reproduction. <b> Statistical Analysis Used: </b> The optical density data were submitted to Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test and compared with two-way ANOVA and Tukey (alpha=0.05). <b> Results:</b> The results of optical density (pixel) were: IH control 45.24<sup> f</sup> (&#x00B1;7.6), PE control 54.93<sup> e </sup> (&#x00B1;4.45), PE 5Wt&#x0025; 60.43<sup> d </sup> (&#x00B1;6.27), IH 1Wt&#x0025; 61.54<sup> cd </sup> (&#x00B1;5.3), PE 1Wt&#x0025; 66.9<sup> bc </sup> (&#x00B1;5.05), IH 5Wt&#x0025; 67.17<sup> b </sup> (&#x00B1;6.01), PE 10Wt&#x0025; 84.55<sup> a </sup> (&#x00B1;5.14), IH 10Wt&#x0025; 85.33<sup> a </sup> (&#x00B1;5.53). On detail reproduction, polyether control was able to copy the 6 &#956;m line. Adding 1 or 5Wt&#x0025; of barium sulfate have not change this characteristic. For the irreversible hydrocolloid, the control group was able to copy a line with 14 &#956;m, however, adding 1Wt&#x0025; barium sulfate, the capability decreased to 22 &#956;m. Adding barium sulfate in the polyether promoted an increase in between the copied lines, for the control, the average distance was 931.6 &#956;m, 936 &#956;m to 1Wt&#x0025; and 954.5 &#956;m to 5 Wt&#x0025;. For the IH, the control presented 975 &#956;m in comparison to 987.25 &#956;m for 1 Wt&#x0025; samples. <b>Conclusion:</b> The addition of barium sulfate was capable of increasing significantly the optical density of tested material, have changed the linear dimension stability, however, have not interfered in detail reproduction only for PE. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Barium sulfate 
690 |a impression materials 
690 |a linear dimension stability and detail reproduction 
690 |a optical density 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Indian Journal of Dental Research, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 63-67 (2010) 
787 0 |n http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2010;volume=21;issue=1;spage=63;epage=67;aulast=Mota 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0970-9290 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1998-3603 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/644675558f2c4d8c8b0e4b69d78bbb41  |z Connect to this object online.