Efficacy of tamsulosin versus tamsulosin plus lithorex-B as medical expulsive therapy following extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of renal and upper ureteric stones; a randomized clinical trial

Introduction: Urolithiasis is one of the most common disorders of urinary system. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of tamsulosin versus tamsulosin plus lithorex-B. Patients and Methods: This study was an open-label, randomized, controlled trial conducted in Yasuj University of Medical...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sadrollah Mehrabi (Author), Leila Manzouri (Author), Asieh Kohzadi (Author), Farhad Mehrabi (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Society of Diabetic Nephropathy Prevention, 2017-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_656f80242f4b4888a9f8bd2b9f1b2acd
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Sadrollah Mehrabi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Leila Manzouri  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Asieh Kohzadi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Farhad Mehrabi  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Efficacy of tamsulosin versus tamsulosin plus lithorex-B as medical expulsive therapy following extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of renal and upper ureteric stones; a randomized clinical trial 
260 |b Society of Diabetic Nephropathy Prevention,   |c 2017-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2345-4202 
500 |a 10.15171/npj.2017.09 
520 |a Introduction: Urolithiasis is one of the most common disorders of urinary system. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of tamsulosin versus tamsulosin plus lithorex-B. Patients and Methods: This study was an open-label, randomized, controlled trial conducted in Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Iran in 2014 to 2015. After taking informed consent, a total of 64 patients aged 18 years and over, presenting with renal or upper ureteral stones up to 20 mm in diameter were enrolled in this study. After extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL), patients were randomly assigned to group A (n = 32) received tamsulosin 0.4 mg and group B (n = 32) received tamsulosin 0.4 mg plus lithorex-B 400 mg orally at bed time daily for 2 weeks. Finally, patients were assessed by KUB and sonography. The stone passage rate, drug adverse effects and pain score were evaluated. All data were analyzed using SPSS 21. Results: There were no significant differences between group A and B regarding stone expulsion rates (40.6% vs 43.7%, P = 0.83), adverse effects (34.4% vs 40.6%, P = 0.79) and mean score of pain (4.31 ± 2.02 vs 5 ± 2.01, P = 0.17) after 2 weeks follow up. Primary stone size was the predicting factor of stone passage (β = -0.42, P = 0.005, Exp (β) = 0.65, CI 95%, Exp (β): 0.48-0.88). Conclusion: Tamsulosin plus lithorex-B is safe and well tolerated with no extra benefit regarding the expulsion rate in 2 weeks follow up. Hence, the necessity of conducting a trial with a longer follow up period providing comparison between tamsulosin and lithorex-B in separate group is felt. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy 
690 |a Medical expulsive therapy 
690 |a Alpha 1-adrenoreceptor Blocker 
690 |a Herbal remedies 
690 |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology 
690 |a RM1-950 
690 |a Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology 
690 |a RC870-923 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Nephropharmacology, Vol 6, Iss 2, Pp 79-84 (2017) 
787 0 |n http://jnephropharmacology.com/PDF/npj-6-79.pdf 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2345-4202 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/656f80242f4b4888a9f8bd2b9f1b2acd  |z Connect to this object online.