Fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain

Aim: To evaluate the fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain. Methods: Different types of maxillary central incisor ceramic brackets from four different commercial brands, Roth prescription (0.022" x 0.028"), were evaluated, namely: Mystique (GAC), InVu...

תיאור מלא

שמור ב:
מידע ביבליוגרפי
Main Authors: Fernando Rayes Manhães (Author), Rosilene Divino (Author), Adriana Simone Lucato (Author), Sílvia Amélia Scudeler Vedovello (Author), Cristian Correa (Author), Heloísa Cristina Valdrigh (Author)
פורמט: ספר
יצא לאור: Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2015-11-01T00:00:00Z.
נושאים:
גישה מקוונת:Connect to this object online.
תגים: הוספת תג
אין תגיות, היה/י הראשונ/ה לתייג את הרשומה!
תיאור
סיכום:Aim: To evaluate the fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain. Methods: Different types of maxillary central incisor ceramic brackets from four different commercial brands, Roth prescription (0.022" x 0.028"), were evaluated, namely: Mystique (GAC), InVu (TP Orthodontics), Clarity (3M Unitek) and Luxi II (RMO Ortohodontics). To evaluate the fracture strength, 0.019"x 0.025" stainless steel orthodontic wires were inserted into the bracket channels and submitted to torsion until they fractured. Results: The InVu brackets showed a significantly higher fracture strength than the other brackets (p<0.05), which did not differ significantly among them (p>0.05). Conclusions: Among the brackets tested, the traditional ceramic bracket InVu showed the highest fracture strength, while the Luxi II bracket, obtained the lowest value.
תאור פריט:10.20396/bjos.v10i3.8641626
1677-3225