A Systematic Approach to Standardizing Drinking Outcomes From Timeline Followback Data

Objective: The timeline followback (TLFB) interview is the gold standard for the quantitative assessment of alcohol use. However, self-reported "drinks" can vary in alcohol content. If this variability is not accounted for, it can compromise the reliability and validity of TLFB data. To im...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christina Marini (Author), Nicole S Northover (Author), Noah D Gold (Author), Ursula K Rogers (Author), Kelley C O'Donnell (Author), Babak Tofighi (Author), Stephen Ross (Author), Michael P Bogenschutz (Author)
Format: Book
Published: SAGE Publishing, 2023-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_65fe23ccb98446a2bc834de21acad0f2
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Christina Marini  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Nicole S Northover  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Noah D Gold  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ursula K Rogers  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kelley C O'Donnell  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Babak Tofighi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Stephen Ross  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Michael P Bogenschutz  |e author 
245 0 0 |a A Systematic Approach to Standardizing Drinking Outcomes From Timeline Followback Data 
260 |b SAGE Publishing,   |c 2023-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1178-2218 
500 |a 10.1177/11782218231157558 
520 |a Objective: The timeline followback (TLFB) interview is the gold standard for the quantitative assessment of alcohol use. However, self-reported "drinks" can vary in alcohol content. If this variability is not accounted for, it can compromise the reliability and validity of TLFB data. To improve the precision of the TLFB data, we developed a detailed standard operating procedure (SOP) to calculate standard drinks more accurately from participant reports. Method: For the new SOP, the volume and alcohol content by volume (ABV) of distinct types of alcoholic beverages were determined based on product websites and other reliable sources. Recipes for specific cocktails were constructed based on recipes from bartending education websites. One standard drink was defined as 0.6 oz (14 g) of absolute alcohol. Standard drink totals were contrasted for the new SOP approach and the standard procedure, which generally assumed that one self-reported drink was equivalent to one standard drink. Results: Relative to the standard TLFB procedure, higher numbers of standard drinks were reported after implementing the TLFB SOP. Conclusions: Variability in procedures for conversion of self-reported alcohol consumption to standard drinks can confound the interpretation of TLFB data. The use and reporting of a detailed SOP can significantly reduce the potential for such inconsistencies. Detailed and consistent procedures for calculation of standard drinks can enhance the quality of TLFB drinking data. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment, Vol 17 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1177/11782218231157558 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2218 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/65fe23ccb98446a2bc834de21acad0f2  |z Connect to this object online.