Selecting Performance Indicators and Targets in Health Care: An International Scoping Review and Standardized Process Framework

• Main Authors: Heenan MA (Author), Randall GE (Author), Evans JM (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: Dove Medical Press, 2022-04-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.
• Notes: 1179-1594
• Keywords: performance indicators; performance measurement; targets; quality; hospitals; process framework; Public aspects of medicine; RA1-1270
• Source: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, Vol Volume 15, Pp 747-764 (2022)

Michael A Heenan, Glen E Randall, Jenna M Evans DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaCorrespondence: Michael A Heenan, Email [e-mail]: Health care organizations monitor hundreds of performance indicators. It is unclear what processes and criteria organizations use to identify the indicators they use, who is involved in these processes, how performance targets are set, and what the impacts of these processes are. The purpose of this study is to synthesize international approaches to indicator selection and develop a standardized process framework.Methods: Using the PubMed and Web of Science search engines, a scoping review of peer reviewed and grey literature following PRISMA-ScR guidelines was conducted to identify documents describing indicator selection processes used by health systems. English-language papers from 11 countries published from 2010 to 2020 were included. Papers were thematically analyzed to develop a standardized process framework.Results: The review included 33 peer-reviewed papers and 11 grey-literature documents. While there are common practices used in health care to select indicators, no single standardized process framework for indicator selection exists. Arbitrary or incomplete indicator selection processes risk over-measurement, lack of alignment with strategic and operational goals, lack of support by end-users, and paralyzed decision-making ability. By consolidating international practices, we developed the 5-P indicator selection process framework to mitigate process risks and support high-quality indicator selection processes.Conclusion: The 5-P indicator selection process framework consists of five domains and 17 elements, and offers health care agencies a practical structure they can use to design indicator selection processes. The framework also provides researchers with a basis by which the implementation of these processes may be evaluated.Keywords: performance indicators, performance measurement, targets, quality, hospitals, process framework