Explaining inequalities in women's mortality between U.S. States

Inequalities in women's mortality between U.S. states are large and growing. It is unknown whether they reflect differences between states in their population characteristics, contextual characteristics, or both. This study systematically examines the large inequalities in women's mortalit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer Karas Montez (Author), Anna Zajacova (Author), Mark D. Hayward (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2016-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_696f34a7491e4df68b9a5c0b6d2824d3
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Jennifer Karas Montez  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Anna Zajacova  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mark D. Hayward  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Explaining inequalities in women's mortality between U.S. States 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2016-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2352-8273 
500 |a 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.07.004 
520 |a Inequalities in women's mortality between U.S. states are large and growing. It is unknown whether they reflect differences between states in their population characteristics, contextual characteristics, or both. This study systematically examines the large inequalities in women's mortality between U.S. states using a multilevel approach. It focuses on "fundamental" social determinants of mortality at the individual and state levels as potential explanations. We analyze data from the 2013 public-use National Longitudinal Mortality Study on women aged 45-89 years and estimate multilevel logistic regression models. The models include women's personal characteristics (age, race/ethnicity, education, employment, income, and marriage) and states' contextual characteristics (economic environment, social cohesion, sociopolitical orientation, physical infrastructure, and tobacco environment). We found that variation in women's mortality across states was significant (p<0.001). Adjusting for women's personal characteristics explained 30% of the variation. Additionally adjusting for states' contextual characteristics explained 62% of the variation; the most important characteristics were social cohesion and economic conditions. No significant mortality differences between any two states remained after accounting for individual and contextual characteristics. Supplementary analyses of men indicate that state contexts have stronger and more pernicious consequences for women than men. Taken together, the findings underscore the importance of 'bringing context back in' and taking a multilevel approach when investigating geographic inequalities in U.S. mortality. Keywords: Mortality, Gender, Inequality, Social determinants, U.S. states, Multilevel 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
690 |a Social sciences (General) 
690 |a H1-99 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n SSM: Population Health, Vol 2, Iss , Pp 561-571 (2016) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827316300465 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2352-8273 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/696f34a7491e4df68b9a5c0b6d2824d3  |z Connect to this object online.