Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Most women use some method of pain relief during labour. There is extensive research evidence available of pharmacological pain relief during labour; however this evidence is not readily available to pregnant women. Decision aids are...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Torvaldsen Siranda (Author), Nassar Natasha (Author), Raynes-Greenow Camille H (Author), Trevena Lyndal (Author), Roberts Christine L (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2010-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_697286fd6c2e40f6a2bf9d44e4672cb1
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Torvaldsen Siranda  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Nassar Natasha  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Raynes-Greenow Camille H  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Trevena Lyndal  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Roberts Christine L  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2010-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/1471-2393-10-15 
500 |a 1471-2393 
520 |a <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Most women use some method of pain relief during labour. There is extensive research evidence available of pharmacological pain relief during labour; however this evidence is not readily available to pregnant women. Decision aids are tools that present evidence based information and allow preference elicitation.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We developed a labour analgesia decision aid. Using a RCT design women either received a decision aid or a pamphlet. Eligible women were primiparous, ≥ 37 weeks, planning a vaginal birth of a single infant and had sufficient English to complete the trial materials. We used a combination of affective (anxiety, satisfaction and participation in decision-making) and behavioural outcomes (intention and analgesia use) to assess the impact of the decision aid, which were assessed before labour.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>596 women were randomised (395 decision aid group, 201 pamphlet group). There were significant differences in knowledge scores between the decision aid group and the pamphlet group (mean difference 8.6, 95% CI 3.70, 13.40). There were no differences between decisional conflict scores (mean difference -0.99 (95% CI -3.07, 1.07), or anxiety (mean difference 0.3, 95% CI -2.15, 1.50). The decision aid group were significantly more likely to consider their care providers opinion (RR 1.28 95%CI 0.64, 0.95). There were no differences in analgesia use and poor follow through between antenatal analgesia intentions and use.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This decision aid improves women's labour analgesia knowledge without increasing anxiety. Significantly, the decision aid group were more informed of labour analgesia options, and considered the opinion of their care providers more often when making their analgesia decisions, thus improving informed decision making.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>Trial registration no: ISRCTN52287533</p> 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Gynecology and obstetrics 
690 |a RG1-991 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, Vol 10, Iss 1, p 15 (2010) 
787 0 |n http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/10/15 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2393 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/697286fd6c2e40f6a2bf9d44e4672cb1  |z Connect to this object online.