Impact of the war in Ukraine on resilience, protective, and vulnerability factors

War or armed conflict is one of the most severe human-made adversities. The current study examines the resilience, protective, and vulnerability factors of a sample of Ukrainian civilians, during the current Russian-Ukrainian war. The level of resilience and coping indicators were compared with the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shaul Kimhi (Author), Yohanan Eshel (Author), Hadas Marciano (Author), Bruria Adini (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2023-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_698dbc1e90844a8abcd3c53f3c78e204
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Shaul Kimhi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yohanan Eshel  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yohanan Eshel  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hadas Marciano  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hadas Marciano  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Bruria Adini  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Impact of the war in Ukraine on resilience, protective, and vulnerability factors 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2023-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2296-2565 
500 |a 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1053940 
520 |a War or armed conflict is one of the most severe human-made adversities. The current study examines the resilience, protective, and vulnerability factors of a sample of Ukrainian civilians, during the current Russian-Ukrainian war. The level of resilience and coping indicators were compared with the responses of an Israeli sample following an armed conflict in May 2021. The data were collected by an internet panel company. A representative sample of Ukrainian residents (N = 1,001) responded to an online questionnaire. A stratified sampling method was employed regarding geographic distribution, gender, and age. The data concerning the Israeli population (N = 647) were also collected by an internet panel company during a recent armed conflict with Gaza (May 2021). Three notable results emerged in this study: (a) The Ukrainian sample reported significantly higher levels of the following: Distress symptoms, sense of danger, and perceived threats, compared with the Israeli sample. However, despite these harsh feelings, the Ukrainian respondents reported substantially higher levels of hope and societal resilience compared, to their Israeli counterparts, and somewhat higher individual and community resilience. (b) The protective factors of the respondents in Ukraine (level of hope, wellbeing, and morale), predicted the three types of resilience (individual, community, and social) better than the vulnerability factors (sense of danger, distress symptoms, and level of threats). (c) The best predictors of the three types of resilience were hope and wellbeing. (d) The demographic characteristics of the Ukrainian respondents hardly added to the prediction of the three types of resilience. It appears that a war that threatens the independence and sovereignty of a country may, under certain conditions, enhance the societal resilience and hope of the population under risk, despite a lower sense of wellbeing and higher levels of distress, sense of danger, and perceived threats. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a war in Ukraine 
690 |a resilience 
690 |a hope 
690 |a morale 
690 |a wellbeing 
690 |a distress symptoms 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontiers in Public Health, Vol 11 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1053940/full 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2296-2565 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/698dbc1e90844a8abcd3c53f3c78e204  |z Connect to this object online.