Evaluation of Surface Microhardness of Silver and Zirconia Reinforced Glass-ionomers with and without Microhydroxyapatite

Statement of problem: Hardness of restorative materials like glass-ionomer is an important factor in the longevity of restoration. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the microhardness of glass-ionomer modified with different materials. Materials and Methods: Sixty disk-shaped specimen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sharafeddin F (Author), Azar MR (Author), Feizi N (Author), Salehi R (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, 2017-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_6a5a0eecb8c746899dba5cb32e37dce7
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Sharafeddin F  |e author 
700 1 0 |a  Azar MR  |e author 
700 1 0 |a  Feizi N  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Salehi R  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Evaluation of Surface Microhardness of Silver and Zirconia Reinforced Glass-ionomers with and without Microhydroxyapatite 
260 |b Shiraz University of Medical Sciences,   |c 2017-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2383-3971 
500 |a 2383-398X 
520 |a Statement of problem: Hardness of restorative materials like glass-ionomer is an important factor in the longevity of restoration. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the microhardness of glass-ionomer modified with different materials. Materials and Methods: Sixty disk-shaped specimens were examined in six groups in this study, including conventional glass-ionomer (Shofu, Japan), zirconia-reinforced glass-ionomer (Zirconomer, Shofu, Kyoto, Japan), silver-reinforced glass-ionomer (HI-DENSE XP, Shofu, Kyoto, Japan) and mixture of these three types of glass-ionomer with 20 wt% of microhydroxyapatite (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA). All the specimens were stored in deionized water for 24 hours. Then Vickers microhardness test was carried out and the results were analyzed by using two-way ANOVA test and paired t-test (P<0.05). Results: Zirconia-reinforced glass-ionomer with microhydroxyapatite exhibited significantly higher microhardness in comparison with other groups (P<0.001). Conventional glass-ionomer with microhydroxyapatite showed the lowest microhardness (P<0.001). After incorporation of microhydroxyapatite in both conventional and silver-reinforced glass-ionomer groups, microhardness decreased significantly (P<0.001).The microhardness of top and bottom of all groups was significantly different. (P<0.001). Conclusions: Incorporation of 20% microhydroxyapatite to zirconia-reinforced glass-ionomer can improve microhardness. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Glass-ionomer Zirconia-reinforced glass-ionomer 
690 |a Silver-reinforced glass-ionomer 
690 |a Microhydroxyapatite 
690 |a Microhardness 
690 |a Glass-ionomer 
690 |a Zirconia-reinforced glass-ionomer 
690 |a Microhydroxyapatite 
690 |a Technology 
690 |a T 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Dental Biomaterial, Vol 4, Iss 4, Pp 454-460 (2017) 
787 0 |n http://jdb.sums.ac.ir/index.php/jdb/article/view/238/162 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2383-3971 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2383-398X 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/6a5a0eecb8c746899dba5cb32e37dce7  |z Connect to this object online.