Comparison of effects of static, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and Mulligan stretching on hip flexion range of motion: a randomized controlled trial
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of static stretching, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching and Mulligan technique on hip flexion range of motion (ROM) in subjects with bilateral hamstring tightness. A total of 40 students (mean age: 21.5±1.3 years, mean body he...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | MS Yıldırım (Author), S Ozyurek (Author), OÇ Tosun (Author), S Uzer (Author), N Gelecek (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Termedia Publishing House,
2016-02-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Effect of active stretching on hip flexion range of motion: 15 versus 30 seconds
by: F. Ayala, et al.
Published: (2010) -
The Effects of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and Static Stretching Performed at Various Intensities on Hamstring Flexibility
by: Woo-taek Lim
Published: (2020) -
Static-stretching vs. contract-relax - proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching: study the effect on muscle response using tensiomyography.
by: Juan Manuel García-Manso, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Acute effects of static versus proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching volume on the maximum number of repetitions and perceived exertion
by: Flavio J. Mangueira, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Comparison Between Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and Mckenzie Method in Lumbar Range of Motion on Non-Specific Low Back Pain
by: Lucky Anggiat Panjaitan, et al.
Published: (2020)