Improving Access for Pediatric and Adult Cochlear Implant Candidates in Ontario

In 2011, the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care announced the one-time allocation of $5.9 million to be shared by cochlear implant programs at five Ontario hospitals. The primary goal of this reform was to address cochlear implant wait times. More specifically, this funding was aimed at r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yvonne Emily James (Author)
Format: Book
Published: McMaster University Library Press, 2016-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_6b3e42f3e1734cc18d8889fad8feb977
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Yvonne Emily James  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Improving Access for Pediatric and Adult Cochlear Implant Candidates in Ontario 
260 |b McMaster University Library Press,   |c 2016-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.13162/hro-ors.v4i2.2823 
500 |a 2291-6369 
520 |a In 2011, the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care announced the one-time allocation of $5.9 million to be shared by cochlear implant programs at five Ontario hospitals. The primary goal of this reform was to address cochlear implant wait times. More specifically, this funding was aimed at reducing adult wait times by 50% and to completely eliminate pediatric waiting lists. Prior to this funding, wait times for pediatric and adult cochlear implants were known to exceed four years. The funding was provided in response to a growing body of research that demonstrates increased speech perception and vocabulary among pediatric recipients, and pressure from parents of children on cochlear implant waiting lists, surgeons and other involved healthcare providers (e.g., auditory verbal therapists, audiologists, and speech language pathologists). The decision to increase funding was also influenced by government stakeholders who believed this one-time investment would be returned as pediatric patients reach adulthood and are better equipped to participate in mainstream (i.e., hearing) society. While this one-time funding model has the potential to eliminate wait times for pediatric patients, thereby ensuring these children can access therapeutic services as early as possible, it does not address the future of cochlear implant waiting lists or the capacity of health human resources to absorb this sudden and unprecedented influx of pediatric patients. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a FR 
690 |a cochlear implants 
690 |a Ontario 
690 |a paediatric cochlear implants 
690 |a health human resources 
690 |a auditory visual therapy 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Health Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé, Vol 4, Iss 2 (2016) 
787 0 |n https://mulpress.mcmaster.ca/hro-ors/article/view/2823/2655 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2291-6369 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/6b3e42f3e1734cc18d8889fad8feb977  |z Connect to this object online.