Using dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor: A single institute experience
Objective: To evaluate the factors associated with the successful induction of labor (IOL) in women treated with dinoprostone slow-released vaginal insert. Material and methods: A retrospective study was conducted between June 2017 and December 2017, enrolling 65 patients who underwent dinoprostone...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Jen-Yu Tseng (Author), I-Chia Lin (Author), Wen-Hsun Chang (Author), Chang-Ching Yeh (Author), Huann-Cheng Horng (Author), Peng-Hui Wang (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Elsevier,
2020-09-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Dinoprostone vaginal insert vs the Foley catheter in labor induction. Observational study
by: Jakub Mlodawski, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Predictive Factors for the Success of Vaginal Dinoprostone for the Induction of Labour
by: Liu W, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Dinoprostone tablet versus continuous vaginal insert (Propess®) for elective induction in low-risk nulliparous women at term
by: Yu-Cheng Nien, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Induction of Labor: A Comparative Study of Intravaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone
by: Aqueela Ayaz
Published: (2010) -
The role of dinoprostone for labor induction in postterm and high-risk term pregnancies
by: I.F. Urunsak, et al.
Published: (2020)