The relationship of high-intensity cross-training with arterial stiffness

Background: Central arterial stiffness is a cardiovascular risk factor that can be readily affected through engagement in physical exercise training, with resistance and aerobic exercise having disparate affects. Despite the growing popularity of high-intensity cross-training (HICT), little is curre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jamie F. Burr (Author), Jenny L. Beck (Author), John J. Durocher (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2019-07-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_6b65eb7dba564585aa9be8b23b6dbab0
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Jamie F. Burr  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jenny L. Beck  |e author 
700 1 0 |a John J. Durocher  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The relationship of high-intensity cross-training with arterial stiffness 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2019-07-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2095-2546 
500 |a 10.1016/j.jshs.2017.01.009 
520 |a Background: Central arterial stiffness is a cardiovascular risk factor that can be readily affected through engagement in physical exercise training, with resistance and aerobic exercise having disparate affects. Despite the growing popularity of high-intensity cross-training (HICT), little is currently known about the effects of this mixed modality exercise stimulus on arterial stiffness. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to characterize the arterial stiffness of habitual HICT participants vs. aerobically active and sedentary controls using a cross-sectional design. Methods: A total of 30 participants were recruited: 10 middle-aged long-term participants of HICT (CrossFit) and 20 age, sex, and height matched controls (10 recreationally active, 10 sedentary). Central and peripheral pulse wave velocities were measured for the carotid-femoral and femoral-dorsalis pedis arterial segments. Aerobic fitness (maximal oxygen uptake, VO2max) was measured and typical exercise participation rates were self-reported for each group. Results: HICT participants manifested central pulse wave velocity (PWV) (5.3 ± 1.0 m/s, mean ± SD) and VO2max (43 ± 6 mL/kg/min) values nearly identical to active controls. Both active groups had significantly better values than sedentary controls (7.1 ± 1.0 m/s, p ≤ 0.001; and 32 ± 7 mL/kg/min, p = 0.01). No differences were observed in peripheral PWV between groups. Conclusion: Habitual participation in HICT exercise was not associated with increased central nor peripheral arterial stiffness. Long-term HICT participants presented with similar fitness and arterial stiffness as compared with participants who practiced traditional aerobic exercise. Compared to sedentary living, HICT may offer musculoskeletal and cardiovascular health benefits without negatively impacting arterial stiffness. Keywords: Circuit training, CrossFit, Pulse wave velocity, Resistance exercise, Vascular, Weight training 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Sports 
690 |a GV557-1198.995 
690 |a Sports medicine 
690 |a RC1200-1245 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Sport and Health Science, Vol 8, Iss 4, Pp 370-375 (2019) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095254617300091 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2095-2546 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/6b65eb7dba564585aa9be8b23b6dbab0  |z Connect to this object online.