PENINGKATAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA MELALUI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SQUARE (TPS) KELAS VI SDN 001 EMPAT BALAI KECAMATAN KUOK KABUPATEN KAMPAR

• Main Author: Maznah ' (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: Laboratorium Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Riau, 2017-03-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.
• Notes: 2303-1514; 2598-5949; 10.33578/jpfkip.v5i3.3929
• Keywords: mathematics learning outcomes, cooperative tps; Education; L
• Source: Primary: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Vol 5, Iss 3, Pp 427-441 (2017)

The background of this research is the lack of students' mathematics learning outcomes. This can be seen from 28 students only 13 students reaching 46.43% KKM. In addition, the average value is obtained by the students was 56.96. This research is a classroom action research (PTK), the research was conducted SDN 001 Empat Balai Kecamatan Kouk. This research was conducted in two cycles by applying the model TPS learners. The purpose of this study is to improve students' mathematics learning outcomes. The data used in this study is the result of learning and activity data of teachers and students. The study states that the TPS learning model can improve the results of math students learn some vital lessons. This is evidenced by: (a) the learning outcomes of students has increased at each cycle. At the base score is the average value obtained was 56.96 by the number of students who completed 13 (46.43%). In the first cycle the average value of the acquisition was 69 with the number of students who completed was 19 (69.86%). In the second cycle of acquisition the average value obtained was 77.43 students complete student number was 24 (85.71%); and (b) the activities of teachers has increased in each cycle, the first cycle 1 meeting obtain a score of 14 (58.33%) with less category, the first cycle 2 meeting obtain a score of 16 (66.67%) with enough categories, in cycle II meeting 1 given a score of 19 (79.16%) in both categories. And the second cycle 2 meeting obtain a score of 21 (87.50%) with a very good category. And the students' activity has increased in the first meeting of the first cycle of activity students obtain a score of 13 (54.16 %%) with less category, the second meeting of the second cycle obtain a score of 16 (66.67%) with enough categories, the first meeting of the second cycle obtain a score of 18 (75.00%) in both categories. And at the second meeting of the second cycle obtain a score of 22 (91.67%) with a frightening good category.