Comparison of cesarean section rates between obstetricians preferring labor induction at early versus late gestational age

Objective: To compare the cesarean section (CS) rates of obstetricians with a preference of labor induction at early versus late gestational age. Material and methods: Medical records of women who were low risk, nulliparous, singleton pregnancy, and >37 weeks and delivered their babies, were revi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liu-Ching Wu (Author), Fu-Shaing Peng (Author), Cheung Leung (Author), Hsin-Fen Lu (Author), Ho-Hsiung Lin (Author), Sheng-Mou Hsiao (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2022-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_6d75862e6b054f0c921c81bbabce8f9c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Liu-Ching Wu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Fu-Shaing Peng  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Cheung Leung  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hsin-Fen Lu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ho-Hsiung Lin  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sheng-Mou Hsiao  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparison of cesarean section rates between obstetricians preferring labor induction at early versus late gestational age 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2022-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1028-4559 
500 |a 10.1016/j.tjog.2022.05.016 
520 |a Objective: To compare the cesarean section (CS) rates of obstetricians with a preference of labor induction at early versus late gestational age. Material and methods: Medical records of women who were low risk, nulliparous, singleton pregnancy, and >37 weeks and delivered their babies, were reviewed. Obstetricians, who preferred labor induction at<41 weeks, were allocated to the early induction group; and the other obstetricians were allocated to the late induction group. Results: The late induction group had a higher percentage of labor induction at ≥41 weeks, compared with the early induction group (21% vs. 8%, p = 0.007). The late induction group had a lower CS rate (11.0% vs. 19.1%, p < 0.001). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard model revealed that the early induction group (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.14, p < 0.001), maternal age (HR = 1.04, p = 0.001), premature rupture of membranes (HR = 1.59, p = 0.006), and birth body weight (kg, HR = 2.13, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of CS. In women receiving labor induction (n = 312), birth body weight (kg, HR = 1.72, p = 0.04) was the sole predictor of CS; and there is a trend that the early induction group (HR = 1.54, p = 0.051) has a higher CS rate, compared with the late induction group. However, gestational age at labor induction was not a predictor of CS. Conclusion: In low-risk pregnancies, obstetricians preferring labor induction at early gestational age seem to be associated with a higher CS rate, compared with obstetricians preferring labor induction at late gestational age. Nonetheless, the above finding seems to be associated with physician's factor, instead of gestational age at labor induction. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Cesarean section 
690 |a Labor, Induced 
690 |a Term birth 
690 |a Gynecology and obstetrics 
690 |a RG1-991 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Vol 61, Iss 5, Pp 847-853 (2022) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455922002170 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1028-4559 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/6d75862e6b054f0c921c81bbabce8f9c  |z Connect to this object online.