Potential mechanisms linking poverty alleviation and health: an analysis of benefit spending among recipients of the U.S. earned income tax credit

Abstract Background The earned income tax credit (EITC) is the largest U.S. poverty alleviation program for low-income families, disbursed annually as a lump-sum tax refund. Despite its well-documented health impacts, the mechanisms through which the EITC affects health are not well understood. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rita Hamad (Author), Joseph Yeb (Author), Kaitlyn Jackson (Author), Wendi Gosliner (Author), Lia C.H. Fernald (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2023-07-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_6e56e7bf3ef6440c9badc7bb0cae6f3a
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Rita Hamad  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Joseph Yeb  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kaitlyn Jackson  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Wendi Gosliner  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lia C.H. Fernald  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Potential mechanisms linking poverty alleviation and health: an analysis of benefit spending among recipients of the U.S. earned income tax credit 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2023-07-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12889-023-16296-1 
500 |a 1471-2458 
520 |a Abstract Background The earned income tax credit (EITC) is the largest U.S. poverty alleviation program for low-income families, disbursed annually as a lump-sum tax refund. Despite its well-documented health impacts, the mechanisms through which the EITC affects health are not well understood. The objective of this analysis was to examine self-reported spending patterns of tax refunds among EITC recipients to clarify potential pathways through which income may affect health. Methods We first examined spending patterns among 2020-2021 Assessing California Communities' Experiences with Safety Net Supports (ACCESS) study participants (N = 241) and then stratified the analysis by key demographic subgroups. Results More than half of EITC recipients reported spending their tax refunds on bills and debt (52.3%), followed by 49.4% on housing, and 37.8% on vehicles. Only 3.3% reported spending on healthcare. (Note: respondents could list more than one possible spending category.) Participants ages 30 + were more likely to spend on bills and debt relative to those ages 18-29 (57.6% versus 39.4%, respectively). Other subgroup analyses did not yield significant findings. Conclusions Our findings suggest that EITC recipients primarily use their refunds on bills and debt, as well as on household and vehicle expenses. This supports the idea of the EITC as a safety net policy which addresses key social determinants of health. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Social determinants of health 
690 |a Poverty 
690 |a Policy evaluation 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Public Health, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 1-5 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16296-1 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2458 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/6e56e7bf3ef6440c9badc7bb0cae6f3a  |z Connect to this object online.