The Impact of an Emergency Fee Increase on the Composition of Patients Visiting Emergency Departments

Objectives: This study aimed to test our hypothesis that a raise in the emergency fee implemented on March 1, 2013 has increased the proportion of patients with emergent symptoms by discouraging non-urgent emergency department visits. Methods: We conducted an analysis of 728 736 patients registered...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hyemin Jung (Author), Young Kyung Do (Author), Yoon Kim (Author), Junsoo Ro (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Korean Society for Preventive Medicine, 2014-11-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_6e63487e0c6d48d2a0f2d2e3d0e0e2e9
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Hyemin Jung  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Young Kyung Do  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yoon Kim  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Junsoo Ro  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The Impact of an Emergency Fee Increase on the Composition of Patients Visiting Emergency Departments 
260 |b Korean Society for Preventive Medicine,   |c 2014-11-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1975-8375 
500 |a 2233-4521 
500 |a 10.3961/jpmph.14.044 
520 |a Objectives: This study aimed to test our hypothesis that a raise in the emergency fee implemented on March 1, 2013 has increased the proportion of patients with emergent symptoms by discouraging non-urgent emergency department visits. Methods: We conducted an analysis of 728 736 patients registered in the National Emergency Department Information System who visited level 1 and level 2 emergency medical institutes in the two-month time period from February 1, 2013, one month before the raise in the emergency fee, to March 31, 2013, one month after the raise. A difference-in-difference method was used to estimate the net effects of a raise in the emergency fee on the probability that an emergency visit is for urgent conditions. Results: The percentage of emergency department visits in urgent or equivalent patients increased by 2.4% points, from 74.2% before to 76.6% after the policy implementation. In a group of patients transferred using public transport or ambulance, who were assumed to be least conscious of cost, the change in the proportion of urgent patients was not statistically significant. On the other hand, the probability that a group of patients directly presenting to the emergency department by private transport, assumed to be most conscious of cost, showed a 2.4% point increase in urgent conditions (p<0.001). This trend appeared to be consistent across the level 1 and level 2 emergency medical institutes. Conclusions: A raise in the emergency fee implemented on March 1, 2013 increased the proportion of urgent patients in the total emergency visits by reducing emergency department visits by non-urgent patients. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Emergency fee 
690 |a Hospital emergency service 
690 |a Overcrowding 
690 |a Difference-in-difference 
690 |a Medicine 
690 |a R 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Vol 47, Iss 6, Pp 309-316 (2014) 
787 0 |n http://www.jpmph.org/upload/pdf/jpmph-47-6-309.pdf 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1975-8375 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2233-4521 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/6e63487e0c6d48d2a0f2d2e3d0e0e2e9  |z Connect to this object online.