Retraction: First viral replication of Covid-19 identified in the peritoneal dialysis fluid

Note editor : retraction of case report https://doi.org/10.25796/bdd.v3i1.54503 Dear Editor-in-chief, By this letter we would like to retract our case report entitled « First viral replication of Covid-19 identified in the peritoneal dialysis fluid of a symptomatic patient» that we submitted to your...

Descrición completa

Gardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Main Authors: Denis Fouque (Author), Mathilde Nouvier (Author)
Formato: Libro
Publicado: RDPLF, 2020-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Acceso en liña:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Engadir etiqueta
Sen Etiquetas, Sexa o primeiro en etiquetar este rexistro!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_6e907acd8c7d41c9b1e8a277d7f2d22c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Denis Fouque  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mathilde Nouvier  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Retraction: First viral replication of Covid-19 identified in the peritoneal dialysis fluid 
260 |b RDPLF,   |c 2020-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2607-9917 
520 |a Note editor : retraction of case report https://doi.org/10.25796/bdd.v3i1.54503 Dear Editor-in-chief, By this letter we would like to retract our case report entitled « First viral replication of Covid-19 identified in the peritoneal dialysis fluid of a symptomatic patient» that we submitted to your journal one week ago. We indeed wanted to inform the renal community of a potential presence of Covid-19 virus in the peritoneal dialysis fluid in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis treatment. However, the patient general status impaired and he was transferred to an intensive care unit for acute myocardial insufficiency. During this stay, he was re-checked for a number of other organs alterations. A total of 7 RT-PCR SARS-Cov2 tests , validated by the National Reference Center, were done : 2 by nasopharyngeal swabs, 1 in bronchoalveolar lavage, 3 peritoneal dialysate and one in stool. A serological test was also performed. All tests were found negative. The CT scan was analyzed again by a specialized radiologist and although a COVID-19 pulmonary disease was likely, it was not possible to rule out a pulmonary edema secondary to an acute myocarditis of different origin. Therefore, based on these later information, and after careful discussion with the virologists, we think that the first positive PCR result was erroneous, without clear explanation for this. Until new cases appear, the fact that two subsequent peritoneal dialysate carefully processed were negative indicates that we cannot reliably prove a peritoneal dialysate contamination by COVID-19 virus in our patient. We deeply apologize for this premature publication. M.Nouvier and D.Fouque for the authors 
546 |a EN 
546 |a FR 
690 |a retracted 
690 |a Internal medicine 
690 |a RC31-1245 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Bulletin de la Dialyse à Domicile, Vol 3, Iss 1 (2020) 
787 0 |n https://ojs.uclouvain.be/index.php/bdd/article/view/54713 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2607-9917 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/6e907acd8c7d41c9b1e8a277d7f2d22c  |z Connect to this object online.