Improving health promotion using quality improvement techniques in Australian Indigenous primary health care

While some areas of clinical health care are becoming adept at implementing continuous quality improvement (CQI) projects, there has been limited experimentation of CQI in health promotion. In this study, we examined the impact of a CQI intervention on health promotion in four Australian Indigenous...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nikki ePercival (Author), Lynette eO'Donoghue (Author), Vivian eLin (Author), Komla eTsey (Author), Ross Stewart Bailie (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2016-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_6f7a46d28a9a4a77bafc9e830d2c1d7f
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Nikki ePercival  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lynette eO'Donoghue  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Vivian eLin  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Komla eTsey  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ross Stewart Bailie  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Improving health promotion using quality improvement techniques in Australian Indigenous primary health care 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2016-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2296-2565 
500 |a 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00053 
520 |a While some areas of clinical health care are becoming adept at implementing continuous quality improvement (CQI) projects, there has been limited experimentation of CQI in health promotion. In this study, we examined the impact of a CQI intervention on health promotion in four Australian Indigenous primary health care centres. Our study objectives were to: (a) describe the scope and quality of health promotion activities; (b) describe the status of health centre system support for health promotion activities; and (c) introduce a CQI intervention and examine the impact on health promotion activities and health centres systems over two years. Baseline assessments showed sub-optimal health centre systems support for health promotion and significant evidence-practice gaps. After two annual CQI cycles, there were improvements in staff understanding of health promotion and systems for planning and documenting health promotion activities had been introduced. Actions to improve best practice health promotion, such as community engagement and intersectoral partnerships, were inhibited by the way health centre systems were organized, predominately to support clinical and curative services. These findings suggest that CQI can improve the delivery of evidence based health promotion by engaging front line health practitioners in decision making processes about the design/redesign of health centre systems to support the delivery of best practice health promotion. However, further and sustained improvements in health promotion will require broader engagement of management, senior staff and members of the local community to address organisational and policy level barriers. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Health Promotion 
690 |a Primary Health Care 
690 |a Quality Improvement 
690 |a feasibility 
690 |a Participatory Action Research 
690 |a evidence-based program 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontiers in Public Health, Vol 4 (2016) 
787 0 |n http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00053/full 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2296-2565 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/6f7a46d28a9a4a77bafc9e830d2c1d7f  |z Connect to this object online.