Annual alveolar bone loss in older adults taking oral bisphosphonate: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract Background Although several studies assessed the effect of bisphosphonate (BIS) administration on alveolar bone loss, this relationship has not been fully investigated using longitudinal analysis. The aim of the this article is to predict annual alveolar bone loss in a subpopulation of olde...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Helmi (Author), Sara AlOsaimy (Author), J. Max Goodson (Author), Hatice Hasturk (Author), Zuhair S. Natto (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2019-11-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_7029173f89244ab18c24fd84992b2f26
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Mohammad Helmi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sara AlOsaimy  |e author 
700 1 0 |a J. Max Goodson  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hatice Hasturk  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Zuhair S. Natto  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Annual alveolar bone loss in older adults taking oral bisphosphonate: a retrospective cohort study 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2019-11-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12903-019-0955-6 
500 |a 1472-6831 
520 |a Abstract Background Although several studies assessed the effect of bisphosphonate (BIS) administration on alveolar bone loss, this relationship has not been fully investigated using longitudinal analysis. The aim of the this article is to predict annual alveolar bone loss in a subpopulation of older adults patients who were taking oral bisphosphonate (BIS), adjusting for systemic diseases and associated risk factors. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study. We identified all subjects who reported receiving oral bisphosphonate from 2008 to 2015 (N = 30) using the electronic health records of each patient to identify suitable radiographs for analysis. For the longitudinal data analysis, 26 subjects were eligible for inclusion, having at least two exposures of the complete mouth set or repeated bitewing radiographs at least a one-year interval; they were then matched on age and sex to another 26 patients who did not report receiving bisphosphonate at any point of their life. Results Mild periodontitis was higher in the BIS group compared to the no BIS group; however, moderate periodontitis was higher in the no BIS group. For those who did not take oral BIS, change over time was not significant after the two-year period. However, the BIS group had experienced 0.088 mm more bone loss compared to the no BIS group (95% CI: 0.001, 0.176. P-value = 0.048), adjusting for all other variables included in the model. Conclusion The group that reported receiving oral bisphosphonates showed no improvement in maintaining alveolar bone level, and the use of oral BIS may not be effective in reducing annual alveolar bone loss; however, emerging evidence is promising for the use of bisphosphonate as an adjunctive local delivery medication for the management of periodontal diseases. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Bisphosphonate 
690 |a Periodontal disease 
690 |a Annual bone loss 
690 |a Predict 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Oral Health, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2019) 
787 0 |n http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-019-0955-6 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6831 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/7029173f89244ab18c24fd84992b2f26  |z Connect to this object online.