The comparative cost of food and beverages at remote Indigenous communities, Northern Territory, Australia

Abstract Objective: To determine the average price difference between foods and beverages in remote Indigenous community stores and capital city supermarkets and explore differences across products. Methods: A cross‐sectional survey compared prices derived from point‐of‐sale data in 20 remote Northe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Megan Ferguson (Author), Kerin O'Dea (Author), Mark Chatfield (Author), Marjory Moodie (Author), Jon Altman (Author), Julie Brimblecombe (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2016-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_710a5ee6b6544a61abf5adf65f0842a3
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Megan Ferguson  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kerin O'Dea  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mark Chatfield  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Marjory Moodie  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jon Altman  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Julie Brimblecombe  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The comparative cost of food and beverages at remote Indigenous communities, Northern Territory, Australia 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2016-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1753-6405 
500 |a 1326-0200 
500 |a 10.1111/1753-6405.12370 
520 |a Abstract Objective: To determine the average price difference between foods and beverages in remote Indigenous community stores and capital city supermarkets and explore differences across products. Methods: A cross‐sectional survey compared prices derived from point‐of‐sale data in 20 remote Northern Territory stores with supermarkets in capital cities of the Northern Territory and South Australia for groceries commonly purchased in remote stores. Average price differences for products, supply categories and food groups were examined. Results: The 443 products examined represented 63% of food and beverage expenditure in remote stores. Remote products were, on average, 60% and 68% more expensive than advertised prices for Darwin and Adelaide supermarkets, respectively. The average price difference for fresh products was half that of packaged groceries for Darwin supermarkets and more than 50% for food groups that contributed most to purchasing. Conclusions: Strategies employed by manufacturers and supermarkets, such as promotional pricing, and supermarkets' generic products lead to lower prices. These opportunities are not equally available to remote customers and are a major driver of price disparity. Implications: Food affordability for already disadvantaged residents of remote communities could be improved by policies targeted at manufacturers, wholesalers and/or major supermarket chains. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a food cost 
690 |a remote Indigenous 
690 |a public policy 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, Vol 40, Iss S1, Pp S21-S26 (2016) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12370 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1326-0200 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1753-6405 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/710a5ee6b6544a61abf5adf65f0842a3  |z Connect to this object online.