Questioni di rigore nella ricerca-azione educativa

Questions of Rigor in Educational Action-Research The paper examines the problems of rigour linked to the use of qualitative methods in pedagogical action-research. Firstly the idea of rigour in pedagogical research is considered. In this regard, the concept of rigour is traced back to three issues...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Massimo Baldacci (Author)
Format: Book
Published: LED Edizioni Universitarie, 2013-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_7142e00b8e4e4944b82f1e7ece891e80
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Massimo Baldacci  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Questioni di rigore nella ricerca-azione educativa 
260 |b LED Edizioni Universitarie,   |c 2013-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2037-7932 
500 |a 2037-7924 
500 |a 10.7358/ecps-2012-006-bald 
520 |a Questions of Rigor in Educational Action-Research The paper examines the problems of rigour linked to the use of qualitative methods in pedagogical action-research. Firstly the idea of rigour in pedagogical research is considered. In this regard, the concept of rigour is traced back to three issues that, although different, are also related: rigour as severity of methods, as scrupulousness in their application and as appropriateness of the approach to the problem dealt with in the study. Then some questions of rigour in action-research based on qualitative methods are examined. In this regard, it is shown that, despite the fact that qualitative methods may be characterized by severe logics which are coherent with their internal epistemology, methodological limits are often found whose roots cannot be traced back exclusively to amateurishness, but may also be due to the cultural predominance assumed by the hermeneutics paradigm, which is capable of inducing a unilateral supremacy when interpreting data. Finally, some general guidelines are formulated for a rigorous approach to qualitative action-research. In this regard, several theoretical and methodological antinomies are compared in an attempt to identify a way of resolving them rationally with respect to action-research, in order to assure an objective epistemological profile to this study approach. The following antinomies are examined: objectivity/subjectivity; realism/constructivism, hermeneutics/pragmatism. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a ES 
546 |a IT 
690 |a action research 
690 |a epistemology 
690 |a methods 
690 |a objectivity 
690 |a qualitative 
690 |a rigour 
690 |a epistemologia 
690 |a metodi qualitativi 
690 |a oggettività 
690 |a ricerca-azione 
690 |a rigore 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, Vol 3, Iss 6, Pp 97-106 (2013) 
787 0 |n https://www.ledonline.it/index.php/ECPS-Journal/article/view/507 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2037-7932 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2037-7924 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/7142e00b8e4e4944b82f1e7ece891e80  |z Connect to this object online.