Morphological Analysis of Dermatoporosis by in vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy and Ultrasonography

Background: Dermatoporosis is defined as a chronic cutaneous fragility and insufficiency syndrome. It results from chronological aging, long-term and unprotected sun exposure, genetic factors, or the chronic use of topical and systemic corticosteroids. There is currently a lack of noninvasive tools...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sébastien Menzinger (Author), Jean-Hilaire Saurat (Author), Gürkan Kaya (Author)
Format: Book
Published: MDPI AG, 2020-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_7488fd616be74003b5214cc479cbe4d4
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Sébastien Menzinger  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jean-Hilaire Saurat  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Gürkan Kaya  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Morphological Analysis of Dermatoporosis by in vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy and Ultrasonography 
260 |b MDPI AG,   |c 2020-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2296-3529 
500 |a 10.1159/000505990 
520 |a Background: Dermatoporosis is defined as a chronic cutaneous fragility and insufficiency syndrome. It results from chronological aging, long-term and unprotected sun exposure, genetic factors, or the chronic use of topical and systemic corticosteroids. There is currently a lack of noninvasive tools for the evaluation and quantification of dermatoporosis. Objectives: The aim of this study was to define the dermal-epidermal modifications which characterize dermatoporosis using noninvasive methods such as in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and ultrasound (US). Subjects and Methods: Seventeen patients with stage I dermatoporosis and 14 healthy volunteers were included in the study. The posterior surface of the right forearm was analyzed in all subjects, and stellate pseudoscars and senile purpura in patients with dermatoporosis were analyzed when possible. We used a commercially available reflectance confocal microscope and measured different histometric parameters (thickness of the epidermis and its different layers, cellular architecture, aspect of the dermal-epidermal junction and the dermis). We also used a commercially available US skin system to define the dermal-epidermal thickness (DET) in all subjects. Results: The DET measured with the US skin system was significantly different between the two groups: mean value 1.19 mm (volunteers group) versus 0.81 mm (patient group). The significant differences measured with RCM were (1) epidermal thickness, (2) number of dermal papillae, and (3) thickness of solar elastosis. Stellate pseudoscars are also characterized by a modified dermis, with a linear organization of the collagen bundles. Conclusion: US and in vivo RCM are useful tools for the diagnosis of dermatoporosis. Dermal-epidermal atrophy, reduction of dermal papillae/area, and the thickness of dermal elastosis seem to be the major histometric parameters which characterize dermatoporosis. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a dermatoporosis 
690 |a in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy 
690 |a ultrasound 
690 |a Dermatology 
690 |a RL1-803 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Dermatopathology, Vol 6, Iss 4, Pp 279-287 (2020) 
787 0 |n https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/505990 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2296-3529 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/7488fd616be74003b5214cc479cbe4d4  |z Connect to this object online.