van Hiele Levels of Thinking Predict Students' Mathematics Grade

The van Hiele levels of thinking has five reasoning levels, namely, holistic, analytic, abstract, deductive, and rigorous. This study aimed to determine the effects of spatial activities to the students' van Hiele Levels of thinking. It evaluated the van Hiele levels of geometrical reasoning ta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Purisima Yap (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Philippine Association of Institutions for Research, Inc., 2014-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_750f8aff5f594c59aeda40ea4f25c7ed
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Purisima Yap  |e author 
245 0 0 |a van Hiele Levels of Thinking Predict Students' Mathematics Grade 
260 |b Philippine Association of Institutions for Research, Inc.,   |c 2014-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2012-3981 
500 |a 2244-0445 
500 |a 10.7719/jpair.v18i1.296 
520 |a The van Hiele levels of thinking has five reasoning levels, namely, holistic, analytic, abstract, deductive, and rigorous. This study aimed to determine the effects of spatial activities to the students' van Hiele Levels of thinking. It evaluated the van Hiele levels of geometrical reasoning taking into account the van Hiele level they reflected and their mathematical accuracy after exposure to spatial activities. Pretest-posttest design was used in this study. Sixty third-year high school students from five sections were the subjects with 30 students each in the control and experimental groups. The results revealed that only Level 1 in the post-test was significant. As to the type of reply, the post-test results showed that the control group acquired low acquisition to high acquisition in each level while the experimental group had low acquisition to complete acquisition in each level. Only Level 2 in the control group and Levels 3 and 4 in the experimental group could predict Mathematics grade. The control group had weaker reasoning capabilities in answering geometry problems; while the experimental group increased their level of reasoning, and thus, were able to answer geometry problems. This study concludes that the exposure to spatial activities would enhance the levels of reasoning of the third-year students in the study of geometry. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a mathematics education 
690 |a modified van hiele levels of thinking 
690 |a spatial exercises 
690 |a mathematics grade 
690 |a true experimental pretest-posttest design 
690 |a don carlos 
690 |a bukidnon 
690 |a philippines 
690 |a Social Sciences 
690 |a H 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n JPAIR, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 93-105 (2014) 
787 0 |n https://philair.ph/index.php/jpair/article/view/296 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2012-3981 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2244-0445 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/750f8aff5f594c59aeda40ea4f25c7ed  |z Connect to this object online.