Risk classification of children and adolescents: priority of care in the emergency unit

ABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate the clinical conditions and the risk classification of children and adolescents treated in a hospital emergency, according to the Pediatric Risk Classification Protocol. Method: cross-sectional study, with 200 participants, using an instrument based on the Pediatric R...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernanda Jorge Magalhães (Author), Francisca Elisângela Teixeira Lima (Author), Lorena Pinheiro Barbosa (Author), Fernanda Jorge Guimarães (Author), Gilvan Ferreira Felipe (Author), Karla Maria Carneiro Rolim (Author), Essyo Pedro Moreira de Lima (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_75bef160d59d4e178bf5fd25c6056f2f
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Fernanda Jorge Magalhães  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Francisca Elisângela Teixeira Lima  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lorena Pinheiro Barbosa  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Fernanda Jorge Guimarães  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Gilvan Ferreira Felipe  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Karla Maria Carneiro Rolim  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Essyo Pedro Moreira de Lima  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Risk classification of children and adolescents: priority of care in the emergency unit 
260 |b Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem. 
500 |a 1984-0446 
500 |a 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0679 
520 |a ABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate the clinical conditions and the risk classification of children and adolescents treated in a hospital emergency, according to the Pediatric Risk Classification Protocol. Method: cross-sectional study, with 200 participants, using an instrument based on the Pediatric Risk Classification Protocol and using odds ratio for the analysis. Results: most participants were male patients in early childhood and who were or weren't in daycare. As for clinical conditions, most showed changes in vital (24.5%) and respiratory (20.0%) signs, most patients (57.5%) did not present pain; 35.5% were classified as urgent and 45.0% as non-urgent. There was a greater chance of being classified as very urgent (orange) when compared to non-urgent (blue). Conclusion: the protocol used contributed to an effective classification and was considered a valid and reliable health technology for determining the priority of care. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a ES 
546 |a PT 
690 |a Child 
690 |a Adolescent 
690 |a Emergency 
690 |a Risk 
690 |a Clinical Protocols 
690 |a Nursing 
690 |a RT1-120 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/pdf/reben/v73s4/0034-7167-reben-73-s4-e20190679.pdf 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/pdf/reben/v73s4/pt_0034-7167-reben-73-s4-e20190679.pdf 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020001600188&tlng=en 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020001600188&tlng=pt 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1984-0446 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/75bef160d59d4e178bf5fd25c6056f2f  |z Connect to this object online.