Risk classification of children and adolescents: priority of care in the emergency unit
ABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate the clinical conditions and the risk classification of children and adolescents treated in a hospital emergency, according to the Pediatric Risk Classification Protocol. Method: cross-sectional study, with 200 participants, using an instrument based on the Pediatric R...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_75bef160d59d4e178bf5fd25c6056f2f | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Fernanda Jorge Magalhães |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Francisca Elisângela Teixeira Lima |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Lorena Pinheiro Barbosa |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Fernanda Jorge Guimarães |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Gilvan Ferreira Felipe |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Karla Maria Carneiro Rolim |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Essyo Pedro Moreira de Lima |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Risk classification of children and adolescents: priority of care in the emergency unit |
260 | |b Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem. | ||
500 | |a 1984-0446 | ||
500 | |a 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0679 | ||
520 | |a ABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate the clinical conditions and the risk classification of children and adolescents treated in a hospital emergency, according to the Pediatric Risk Classification Protocol. Method: cross-sectional study, with 200 participants, using an instrument based on the Pediatric Risk Classification Protocol and using odds ratio for the analysis. Results: most participants were male patients in early childhood and who were or weren't in daycare. As for clinical conditions, most showed changes in vital (24.5%) and respiratory (20.0%) signs, most patients (57.5%) did not present pain; 35.5% were classified as urgent and 45.0% as non-urgent. There was a greater chance of being classified as very urgent (orange) when compared to non-urgent (blue). Conclusion: the protocol used contributed to an effective classification and was considered a valid and reliable health technology for determining the priority of care. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
546 | |a ES | ||
546 | |a PT | ||
690 | |a Child | ||
690 | |a Adolescent | ||
690 | |a Emergency | ||
690 | |a Risk | ||
690 | |a Clinical Protocols | ||
690 | |a Nursing | ||
690 | |a RT1-120 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.scielo.br/pdf/reben/v73s4/0034-7167-reben-73-s4-e20190679.pdf | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.scielo.br/pdf/reben/v73s4/pt_0034-7167-reben-73-s4-e20190679.pdf | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020001600188&tlng=en | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020001600188&tlng=pt | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/1984-0446 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/75bef160d59d4e178bf5fd25c6056f2f |z Connect to this object online. |