Influence of isolated cleft palate and palatoplasty on the face

INTRODUCTION: The literature has demonstrated that alterations in craniofacial morphology characterizing individuals with cleft palate are observed in both operated and unoperated patients. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the influence of isolated cleft palate and palatoplasty on the face, based on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Omar Gabriel da Silva Filho (Author), Larissa Alves de Albuquerque Rosa (Author), Rita de Cássia M. Carvalho Lauris (Author)
Format: Book
Published: University of São Paulo, 2007-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_7704f5fb8c7041b687c1e3e03a9bd2b6
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Omar Gabriel da Silva Filho  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Larissa Alves de Albuquerque Rosa  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rita de Cássia M. Carvalho Lauris  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Influence of isolated cleft palate and palatoplasty on the face 
260 |b University of São Paulo,   |c 2007-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1590/S1678-77572007000300009 
500 |a 1678-7757 
500 |a 1678-7765 
520 |a INTRODUCTION: The literature has demonstrated that alterations in craniofacial morphology characterizing individuals with cleft palate are observed in both operated and unoperated patients. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the influence of isolated cleft palate and palatoplasty on the face, based on facial analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Lateral facial photographs of the right side of 85 young adult patients with cleft palate were analyzed, of whom 50 were operated on and 35 had never received any previous surgical treatment. The nasolabial angle and zygomatic projection were used to define the maxillary position in the face. Mandibular positioning was classified as Pattern I, II and III. RESULTS: Patients were distributed into 54.12% as Pattern I, 32.94% Pattern II and 12.94% Pattern III. Distribution of facial patterns did not show statistically significant differences between groups (p>0.05). Although palatoplasty did not influence the facial pattern, the zygomatic projection was vulnerable to plastic surgeries. Twenty-eight percent of the patients in the operated group showed zygomatic deficiency, compared to only 8.5% in the unoperated group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with isolated cleft palate, palatoplasty may influence negatively the sagittal behavior of the maxilla, according to the zygomatic projection of the face, though without compromising the facial pattern. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Cleft lip 
690 |a Cleft palate 
690 |a Surgery 
690 |a Face 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Applied Oral Science, Vol 15, Iss 3, Pp 199-208 (2007) 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572007000300009 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1678-7757 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1678-7765 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/7704f5fb8c7041b687c1e3e03a9bd2b6  |z Connect to this object online.