Comparative evaluation of debris extruded apically by using, Protaper retreatment file, K3 file and H-file with solvent in endodontic retreatment

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the apical extrusion of debris comparing 2 engine driven systems and hand instrumentation technique during root canal retreatment. Materials and Methods: Forty five human permanent mandibular premolars were prepared using the step-back technique, obturated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chetna Arora (Author), Rohit Bahri (Author), Neelam Mittal (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_7a1ca2c6555f46f2b9f93aaf733bf75d
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Chetna Arora  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rohit Bahri  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Neelam Mittal  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparative evaluation of debris extruded apically by using, Protaper retreatment file, K3 file and H-file with solvent in endodontic retreatment 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2320-1495 
500 |a 10.4103/1658-5984.112706 
520 |a Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the apical extrusion of debris comparing 2 engine driven systems and hand instrumentation technique during root canal retreatment. Materials and Methods: Forty five human permanent mandibular premolars were prepared using the step-back technique, obturated with gutta-percha/zinc oxide eugenol sealer and cold lateral condensation technique. The teeth were divided into three groups: Group A: Protaper retreatment file, Group B: K3, file Group C: H-file with tetrachloroethylene. All the canals were irrigated with 20ml distilled water during instrumentation. Debris extruded along with the irrigating solution during retreatment procedure was carefully collected in preweighed Eppendorf tubes. The tubes were stored in an incubator for 5 days, placed in a desiccator and then re-weighed. Weight of dry debris was calculated by subtracting the weight of the tube before instrumentation and from the weight of the tube after instrumentation. Data was analyzed using Two Way ANOVA and Post Hoc test. Results : There was statistically significant difference in the apical extrusion of debris between hand instrumentation and protaper retreatment file and K3 file. The amount of extruded debris caused by protaper retreatment file and K3 file instrumentation technique was not statistically significant. All the three instrumentation techniques produced apically extruded debris and irrigant. Conclusion: The best way to minimize the extrusion of debris is by adapting crown down technique therefore the use of rotary technique (Protaper retreatment file, K3 file) is recommended. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Apical extrusion 
690 |a endodontic retreatment 
690 |a H-file K3 file 
690 |a protaper retreatment files 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Saudi Endodontic Journal, Vol 2, Iss 3, Pp 136-141 (2012) 
787 0 |n http://www.saudiendodj.com//article.asp?issn=1658-5984;year=2012;volume=2;issue=3;spage=136;epage=141;aulast=Arora 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2320-1495 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/7a1ca2c6555f46f2b9f93aaf733bf75d  |z Connect to this object online.