Improving the representativeness of the tribal behavioral risk factor surveillance system through data integration

Abstract Background Previous literature showed significant health disparities between Native American population and other populations such as Non-Hispanic White. Most existing studies for Native American Health were based on non-probability samples which suffer with selection bias. In this paper, w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sixia Chen (Author), Janis Campbell (Author), Erin Spain (Author), Alexandra Woodruff (Author), Cuyler Snider (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_7a2fb8b22b554d9c9d72f8ed46bff4c6
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Sixia Chen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Janis Campbell  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Erin Spain  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Alexandra Woodruff  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Cuyler Snider  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Improving the representativeness of the tribal behavioral risk factor surveillance system through data integration 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2023-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12889-023-15159-z 
500 |a 1471-2458 
520 |a Abstract Background Previous literature showed significant health disparities between Native American population and other populations such as Non-Hispanic White. Most existing studies for Native American Health were based on non-probability samples which suffer with selection bias. In this paper, we are the first to evaluate the effectiveness of data integration methods, including calibration and sequential mass imputation, to improve the representativeness of the Tribal Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (TBRFSS) in terms of reducing the biases of the raw estimates. Methods We evaluated the benefits of our proposed data integration methods, including calibration and sequential mass imputation, by using the 2019 TBRFSS and the 2018 and 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). We combined the data from the 2018 and 2019 BRFSS by composite weighting. Demographic variables and general health variables were used as predictors for data integration. The following health-related variables were used for evaluation in terms of biases: Smoking status, Arthritis status, Cardiovascular Disease status, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease status, Asthma status, Cancer status, Stroke status, Diabetes status, and Health Coverage status. Results For most health-related variables, data integration methods showed smaller biases compared with unadjusted TBRFSS estimates. After calibration, the demographic and general health variables benchmarked with those for the BRFSS. Conclusion Data integration procedures, including calibration and sequential mass imputation methods, hold promise for improving the representativeness of the TBRFSS. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Data integration 
690 |a Nonprobability sample 
690 |a Selection bias 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Public Health, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15159-z 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2458 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/7a2fb8b22b554d9c9d72f8ed46bff4c6  |z Connect to this object online.