A Curriculum Innovation on Writing Simulated Patient Cases for Communication Skills Education

Introduction Facilitated communication practice with simulated patients (SPs) is a highly effective form of communication training. Unfortunately, little guidance exists on writing SP cases. Methods We created a curriculum composed of a case-development workbook and case-writing session with input f...

Volledige beschrijving

Bewaard in:
Bibliografische gegevens
Hoofdauteurs: April R. Christensen (Auteur), Carla L. Spagnoletti (Auteur), Rene N. Claxton (Auteur)
Formaat: Boek
Gepubliceerd in: Association of American Medical Colleges, 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Onderwerpen:
Online toegang:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Voeg label toe
Geen labels, Wees de eerste die dit record labelt!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_7b07fd5a35fa421c8fc08c9f974b2c98
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a April R. Christensen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Carla L. Spagnoletti  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rene N. Claxton  |e author 
245 0 0 |a A Curriculum Innovation on Writing Simulated Patient Cases for Communication Skills Education 
260 |b Association of American Medical Colleges,   |c 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11068 
500 |a 2374-8265 
520 |a Introduction Facilitated communication practice with simulated patients (SPs) is a highly effective form of communication training. Unfortunately, little guidance exists on writing SP cases. Methods We created a curriculum composed of a case-development workbook and case-writing session with input from national communication educators. In November 2017, we implemented the curriculum in a Teaching Communication Skills course for medical educators. Educators divided into four groups to write cases. Primary outcome was the number of criteria that cases fulfilled. Secondary outcomes were SP evaluation and educator-reported confidence and satisfaction. Results Seventeen medical educators (including 15 fellows) completed the curriculum. Four new cases were analyzed against 24 criteria and compared to eight cases written by educators following a previous curriculum. An SP evaluated ease of portrayal for all 12 cases on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = poor, 5 = excellent). Educators completed precurriculum and postcurriculum surveys. Compared to the previous curriculum, cases based on the new curriculum incorporated 26% more case criteria (70% or 16.8 criteria/case vs. 96% or 23.0 criteria/case, p < .01). Ease-of-portrayal rating improved but did not differ statistically (mean: 2.8 vs. 4.5, p = .11). A moderate correlation was found between number of included case criteria and Likert-scale rating (rs = .61, p = .03). Pre- and postcurriculum, educators reported significant increases in confidence (mean: 1.9 vs. 4.0, p < .01) and high curricular satisfaction (mean: 4.8). Discussion A case-development workbook and case-writing session increased the quality of newly developed SP cases as assessed by prespecified case criteria. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Communication Training 
690 |a Communication Skills 
690 |a Simulated Patients 
690 |a Curriculum Development 
690 |a Case Writing 
690 |a Flipped Classroom 
690 |a Medicine (General) 
690 |a R5-920 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n MedEdPORTAL, Vol 17 (2021) 
787 0 |n http://www.mededportal.org/doi/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11068 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2374-8265 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/7b07fd5a35fa421c8fc08c9f974b2c98  |z Connect to this object online.