Identifying gram-positive cocci in dermatoscopes and smartphone adapters using MALDI-TOF MS: a cross-sectional study,

• Huvudupphovsmän: Maurício de Quadros (Författare, medförfattare), Roberto Carlos Freitas Bugs (Författare, medförfattare), Renata de Oliveira Soares (Författare, medförfattare), Adriana Medianeira Rossato (Författare, medförfattare), Lisiane da Luz Rocha (Författare, medförfattare), Pedro Alves d'Azevedo (Författare, medförfattare)
• Materialtyp: Bok
• Publicerad: Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia, 2020-07-01T00:00:00Z.
• Ämnen: article
• Länkar: Connect to this object online.
• Notes: 0365-0596; 10.1016/j.abd.2019.11.004
• Keywords: Dermoscopy; Gram-positive cocci; Mass spectrometry; Microbial sensitivity tests; Dermatology; RL1-803
• Source: Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, Vol 95, Iss 3, Pp 298-306 (2020)

Abstract Background: The increasingly frequent use of dermoscopy makes us think about the possibility of transfer of microorganisms, through the dermatoscope, between doctor and patients. Objectives: To identify the most frequent gram-positive cocci in dermatoscopes and smartphone adapters, as well as the resistance profile, and to evaluate the factors associated with a higher risk of bacterial contamination of the dermatoscopes. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out with 118 dermatologists from Porto Alegre/Brazil between September 2017 and July 2018. Gram-positive cocci were identified by MALDI-TOF MS and habits of use of the dermatoscope were evaluated through an anonymous questionnaire. Results: Of the dermatoscopes analysed, 46.6% had growth of gram-positive cocci on the lens and 37.3% on the on/off button. The microorganisms most frequently found were S. epidermidis, S. hominis and S. warneri. Attending a hospital, using the dermatoscope at the hospital, with inpatients and in the intensive care unit were significantly associated with colonisation by gram-positive cocci. The highest resistance rates were observed for penicillin, erythromycin and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim. Study limitations: The non-search of gram-negative bacilli, fungi and viruses. Moreover, the small number of adapters did not make it possible to better define if the frequency differences were statistically significant. Conclusion: Coagulase-negative staphylococci were frequently identified. S. aureus was detected only on the lens.