Measuring shared decision making in oncology: Development and first testing of the iSHAREpatient and iSHAREphysician questionnaires

Abstract Background Existing measures to assess shared decision making (SDM) have often been developed based on an ill‐defined underlying construct, and many assess physician behaviours only or focus on a single patient‐physician encounter. Objective To (a) develop a patient and a physician question...

पूर्ण विवरण

में बचाया:
ग्रंथसूची विवरण
मुख्य लेखकों: Hanna Bomhof‐Roordink (लेखक), Fania R. Gärtner (लेखक), Nanny vanDuijn‐Bakker (लेखक), Trudy van derWeijden (लेखक), Anne M. Stiggelbout (लेखक), Arwen H. Pieterse (लेखक)
स्वरूप: पुस्तक
प्रकाशित: Wiley, 2020-04-01T00:00:00Z.
विषय:
ऑनलाइन पहुंच:Connect to this object online.
टैग: टैग जोड़ें
कोई टैग नहीं, इस रिकॉर्ड को टैग करने वाले पहले व्यक्ति बनें!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_7b6f41a10e8949c2b2e79a35dc3fc7a4
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Hanna Bomhof‐Roordink  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Fania R. Gärtner  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Nanny vanDuijn‐Bakker  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Trudy van derWeijden  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Anne M. Stiggelbout  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Arwen H. Pieterse  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Measuring shared decision making in oncology: Development and first testing of the iSHAREpatient and iSHAREphysician questionnaires 
260 |b Wiley,   |c 2020-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1369-7625 
500 |a 1369-6513 
500 |a 10.1111/hex.13015 
520 |a Abstract Background Existing measures to assess shared decision making (SDM) have often been developed based on an ill‐defined underlying construct, and many assess physician behaviours only or focus on a single patient‐physician encounter. Objective To (a) develop a patient and a physician questionnaire to measure SDM in oncology and (b) determine their content validity and comprehensibility. Methods A systematic review of SDM models and an oncology‐specific SDM model informed the domains of the SDM construct. We formulated items for each SDM domain. Cancer patients and physicians rated content validity in an online questionnaire. We assumed a formative measurement model and performed online field‐testing in cancer patients to inform further item reduction. We tested item comprehension in cognitive interviews with cancer patients and physicians. Results We identified 17 domains and formulated 132 items. Twelve cancer patients rated content validity at item level, and 11 physicians rated content validity at domain level. We field‐tested the items among 131 cancer patients and conducted cognitive interviews with eight patients and five physicians. These phases resulted in the 15‐item iSHAREpatient and 15‐item iSHAREphysician questionnaires, covering 13 domains. Conclusions We thoroughly developed the iSHARE questionnaires. They both assess patient and physician behaviours and cover the entire SDM process rather than a single consultation. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a content validity 
690 |a field‐testing 
690 |a formative 
690 |a oncology 
690 |a questionnaire 
690 |a shared decision making 
690 |a Medicine (General) 
690 |a R5-920 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Health Expectations, Vol 23, Iss 2, Pp 496-508 (2020) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13015 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1369-6513 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1369-7625 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/7b6f41a10e8949c2b2e79a35dc3fc7a4  |z Connect to this object online.