Psychosocial Risks: Is Risk Management Strategic Enough in Business and Policy Making?

Background: In times of continuous change and volatile markets, organizations are increasingly characterized by downsizing, work intensification, and resource rationalization. This has resulted in diversification, and the emergence of new risks within the field of occupational health and safety, wit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Melissa K. Langenhan (Author), Stavroula Leka (Author), Aditya Jain (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2013-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_7cee3b4a60884312b4df1e51e7568c1a
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Melissa K. Langenhan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Stavroula Leka  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Aditya Jain  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Psychosocial Risks: Is Risk Management Strategic Enough in Business and Policy Making? 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2013-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2093-7911 
500 |a 10.1016/j.shaw.2013.04.003 
520 |a Background: In times of continuous change and volatile markets, organizations are increasingly characterized by downsizing, work intensification, and resource rationalization. This has resulted in diversification, and the emergence of new risks within the field of occupational health and safety, with an important impact. This paper focuses on one such type of risk in the modern workplace-psychosocial risks. The current study aimed to explore stakeholder perspectives, regarding the extent to which psychosocial risks are incorporated into strategic risk management practices, at both the business and policy level. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 professionals, representing employer, expert, policy maker, and trade union stakeholder perspectives. Results: It was found that the majority of organizations do not sufficiently, if at all, understand and incorporate psychosocial risks into strategic decision making, whereby the key barrier related to practical difficulties of not knowing how to manage psychosocial risks adequately. Conclusion: The study found that there is a need to close the gap between policy and practice on a number of levels. Future recommendations comprise a policy framework and infrastructure underpinned by educational initiatives, partnerships, and networks to drive a shift in attitudes toward recognizing the duality of the concept of risk (including both potential negative and positive outcomes) and moving beyond simple regulatory compliance. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a organizations 
690 |a policy making 
690 |a psychosocial risk 
690 |a strategy 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Safety and Health at Work, Vol 4, Iss 2, Pp 87-94 (2013) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791113000048 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2093-7911 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/7cee3b4a60884312b4df1e51e7568c1a  |z Connect to this object online.