An Updated Comparison of Current Impression Techniques Regarding Time, Comfort, Anxiety, and Preference: A Randomized Crossover Trial
Objective: To compare digital and conventional impressions in terms of impression time, and comfort, anxiety, and preference of the patients.Methods: Digital scans (Trios 3 Cart) and conventional impressions (irreversible hydrocolloid material, hand-mixed) were randomly performed on 39 patients by a...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Galenos Yayinevi,
2021-12-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_7d3896b50e1d4f289b35320b2c28dbe4 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Hakan Yılmaz |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Fatma Aslı Konca |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Merve Nur Aydın |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a An Updated Comparison of Current Impression Techniques Regarding Time, Comfort, Anxiety, and Preference: A Randomized Crossover Trial |
260 | |b Galenos Yayinevi, |c 2021-12-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 2528-9659 | ||
500 | |a 2148-9505 | ||
500 | |a 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2021.21025 | ||
520 | |a Objective: To compare digital and conventional impressions in terms of impression time, and comfort, anxiety, and preference of the patients.Methods: Digital scans (Trios 3 Cart) and conventional impressions (irreversible hydrocolloid material, hand-mixed) were randomly performed on 39 patients by a single experienced operator at 14-21-day intervals (crossover design). The impression time, comfort score with the visual analog scale, anxiety level with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and preference with a questionnaire, were recorded. The 2 techniques were compared with the independent t-test in terms of time, comfort, and anxiety. Patient-operator assessment and time-comfort relationship were analyzed using Pearson's correlation test.Results: No statistical difference was found between the 2 impression techniques in terms of time (P = .231). Both the operators' and patients' comfort scores showed that the digital technique was found to be more comfortable (P < .001). There was no statistical difference between the 2 techniques with regard to anxiety (P = .668). The patients' and operators' comfort scores showed a strong correlation (P < .001), but no correlation was found between comfort and time (P > .05).Conclusion: Digital scanning and conventional dental impression were similar in terms of impression time and anxiety of patients. However, patients were more satisfied with the digital technique, and preferred it. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a intraoral scanner | ||
690 | |a dental impression | ||
690 | |a patient comfort | ||
690 | |a dental anxiety | ||
690 | |a clinical efficiency | ||
690 | |a Dentistry | ||
690 | |a RK1-715 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 34, Iss 4, Pp 227-233 (2021) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/an-updated-comparison-of-current-mpression-techniq/53307 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2528-9659 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2148-9505 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/7d3896b50e1d4f289b35320b2c28dbe4 |z Connect to this object online. |