Interest and outcomes of alveolar distraction osteogenesis for dental implant rehabilitation following mandibular reconstruction

Introduction: Alveolar distraction osteogenesis (ADO) is one of vertical bone augmentation technique used to restore the vertical bone discrepancy between the transplanted graft and the residual alveolar bone after mandibular reconstruction. The aim of this article is to present the clinical outcome...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Callies Philippine (Author), Gellée Timothée (Author), Samama Mickael (Author)
Format: Book
Published: EDP Sciences, 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_7f0c7ac4eee84992b092652b9669a4b8
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Callies Philippine  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Gellée Timothée  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Samama Mickael  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Interest and outcomes of alveolar distraction osteogenesis for dental implant rehabilitation following mandibular reconstruction 
260 |b EDP Sciences,   |c 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2608-1326 
500 |a 10.1051/mbcb/2021023 
520 |a Introduction: Alveolar distraction osteogenesis (ADO) is one of vertical bone augmentation technique used to restore the vertical bone discrepancy between the transplanted graft and the residual alveolar bone after mandibular reconstruction. The aim of this article is to present the clinical outcomes of ADO applied to reconstructed mandible for three patients. Observation: Three patients underwent alveolar distraction osteogenesis procedure on mandibula reconstructed by fibula free flap (n = 2) or iliac crest free flap (n = 1). The mean bone height increase was 11 mm. 16 implants have been placed in all patients, with a success rate of 100% and a mean follow-up of 25 months. Two complications occurred without compromising the final outcome of the procedure: one fracture of the basal bone and one bony interference, both during activation phase. Commentaries: ADO can be performed on reconstructed mandible with free flap to restore alveolar height. An acceptable implant-to-crown ratio allows an optimal supported implant prosthesis. The particular antecedent of our patients can lead to uncommon complications such as basal bone fracture, but doesn't seem to compromise implant placement with good success rate. Conclusions: ADO performed on reconstructed mandible allows appropriate dental implant rehabilitation, achieving good esthetics and occlusal outcomes. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a alveolar distraction 
690 |a dental implant 
690 |a mandibular reconstruction 
690 |a free flap 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
690 |a Surgery 
690 |a RD1-811 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery, Vol 27, Iss 4, p 56 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://www.jomos.org/articles/mbcb/full_html/2021/04/mbcb200194/mbcb200194.html 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2608-1326 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/7f0c7ac4eee84992b092652b9669a4b8  |z Connect to this object online.