Comparing radiation doses in CBCT and Medical CT imaging for dental applications

Background: We are always concerned about radiation exposure during dental imaging procedures. We explore the crucial differences in radiation doses between Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Medical computed tomography (CT) imaging, aiming to shed light on the safety and efficiency of these t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mahmud U Zaman (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2024-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_7faedf4565fe4dbe9a3c67f58d2292b4
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Mahmud U Zaman  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparing radiation doses in CBCT and Medical CT imaging for dental applications 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2024-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0975-7406 
500 |a 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1077_23 
520 |a Background: We are always concerned about radiation exposure during dental imaging procedures. We explore the crucial differences in radiation doses between Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Medical computed tomography (CT) imaging, aiming to shed light on the safety and efficiency of these techniques. Materials and Methods: In this study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis using state-of-the-art dental imaging equipment. We employed phantoms that simulated real dental scenarios, ensuring accuracy in our measurements. The radiation doses were measured with precision dosimeters, and various exposure settings were tested to obtain a comprehensive dataset. Results: Our findings reveal substantial differences in radiation doses between CBCT and Medical CT for dental applications. In the case of CBCT, the average effective dose was found to be approximately 100 microsieverts (μSv), making it a preferable choice for routine dental imaging. Medical CT, on the other hand, yielded significantly higher radiation exposure, with an average effective dose exceeding 500 μSv, emphasizing its need for specific clinical scenarios. Conclusion: In conclusion, the choice between CBCT and Medical CT for dental applications should be made with careful consideration of radiation dose implications. CBCT emerges as the safer and more efficient option for routine dental imaging, offering a lower radiation burden to patients while still delivering high-quality diagnostic images. However, Medical CT may be necessary for specialized cases where the additional radiation risk is justified by diagnostic requirements. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a cbct 
690 |a dental imaging 
690 |a diagnostic imaging 
690 |a effective dose 
690 |a medical ct 
690 |a radiation dose 
690 |a safety 
690 |a Pharmacy and materia medica 
690 |a RS1-441 
690 |a Analytical chemistry 
690 |a QD71-142 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 16, Iss 5, Pp 883-885 (2024) 
787 0 |n http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2024;volume=16;issue=5;spage=883;epage=885;aulast=Zaman 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0975-7406 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/7faedf4565fe4dbe9a3c67f58d2292b4  |z Connect to this object online.