Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Side Effects in Pediatric Azithromycin Users Between 2019 and 2021: a retrospective study

Objective: To verify the prevalence of gastrointestinal side effects in patients who used azithromycin between 2019 and 2021. Methodology: This study has a quantitative, retrospective character, using data from 200 patient records between 2019 and 2021. Inclusion criteria were patients who were hosp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: José R. SANTOS-NETO (Author), Mirla F. BORGES (Author), Isabella R. DESTEFANI (Author), Natalia B. PINTO (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Farmácia Hospitalar e Serviços de Saúde, 2023-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_7fc610e276a94e4c8e2395c89011489a
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a José R. SANTOS-NETO  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mirla F. BORGES  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Isabella R. DESTEFANI  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Natalia B. PINTO  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Side Effects in Pediatric Azithromycin Users Between 2019 and 2021: a retrospective study 
260 |b Sociedade Brasileira de Farmácia Hospitalar e Serviços de Saúde,   |c 2023-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.30968/rbfhss.2023.141.0878 
500 |a 2179-5924 
500 |a 2316-7750 
520 |a Objective: To verify the prevalence of gastrointestinal side effects in patients who used azithromycin between 2019 and 2021. Methodology: This study has a quantitative, retrospective character, using data from 200 patient records between 2019 and 2021. Inclusion criteria were patients who were hospitalized or admitted to the emergency department without any gastrointestinal complaints and who during hospitalization used azithromycin both alone and in conjunction with other antibiotics, regardless of gender. Exclusion criteria were: patients who arrived at the emergency room or outpatient clinic reporting gastrointestinal symptoms, but who did not use macrolides; patients with previous gastrointestinal inflammatory diseases, as it can cause a confounding factor in the inferential analysis. Results: the prevalence found was 24.5%; the most reported side effects were: diarrhea (39.6%), constipation (29.2%), bloating (12.5%), vomiting (10.4%), abdominal pain (8.3%); the Odds Ratio (OR) of length of stay in days and dosage were 1.23 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.42) and 1.001 (95% CI 1.0008 to 1.002), respectively. Conclusion: The high prevalence of side effects and the associations evaluated show the importance of efficient care in order to reduce them. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a PT 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
690 |a Pharmacy and materia medica 
690 |a RS1-441 
690 |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology 
690 |a RM1-950 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Revista Brasileira de Farmácia Hospitalar e Serviços de Saúde, Vol 14, Iss 1 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://rbfhss.org.br/sbrafh/article/view/878 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2179-5924 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2316-7750 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/7fc610e276a94e4c8e2395c89011489a  |z Connect to this object online.