Survival impact of bowel resection at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer
Objectives: To evaluate the impact of bowel resection at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery on survival. Methods: We identified patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery between 2008 and 2018 from a single-institution tumo...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Elsevier,
2021-11-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_811d727f44634b28a40a6df1c17fdb0a | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Blair McNamara |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Rosa Guerra |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Jennifer Qin |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Amaranta D. Craig |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Lee-may Chen |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Madhulika G. Varma |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Jocelyn S. Chapman |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Survival impact of bowel resection at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer |
260 | |b Elsevier, |c 2021-11-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 2352-5789 | ||
500 | |a 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100870 | ||
520 | |a Objectives: To evaluate the impact of bowel resection at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery on survival. Methods: We identified patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery between 2008 and 2018 from a single-institution tumor registry. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were performed comparing patients who underwent bowel resection to those who did not. Results: Of 158 patients, 43 (27%) underwent bowel resection. Rates of optimal (95%) and sub-optimal (5%) resection did not differ with bowel resection. Patients that required bowel resection had worse three-year survival (43% vs. 63%), even after adjusting for confounding variables of age, stage, number of neoadjuvant cycles, R0 resection, and ASA score (HR 2.27, p < 0.01). Adjusted progression-free survival did not differ between groups (HR 0.92, p = 0.72). Patients who underwent bowel resection were more likely to require blood transfusion (p < 0.01), and have a longer hospital stay (5 days vs 7.5 days, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Bowel resection at the time of interval cytoreduction confers a greater than 2-fold increased risk of mortality and does not impact progression-free survival. Long-term sequelae of the peri-operative morbidity of bowel resection may contribute to increased mortality, and bowel resection may be a surrogate for disease biology with poor prognosis. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a Bowel resection | ||
690 | |a Ovarian cancer | ||
690 | |a Neoadjuvant chemotherapy | ||
690 | |a Interval cytoreduction | ||
690 | |a Gynecology and obstetrics | ||
690 | |a RG1-991 | ||
690 | |a Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens | ||
690 | |a RC254-282 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Gynecologic Oncology Reports, Vol 38, Iss , Pp 100870- (2021) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578921001740 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2352-5789 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/811d727f44634b28a40a6df1c17fdb0a |z Connect to this object online. |