The development of a performance evaluation index system for Chinese Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: a Delphi consensus study

• Main Authors: Huimin Sun (Author), Ying Wang (Author), Huanle Cai (Author), Pengyu Wang (Author), Jie Jiang (Author), Congxing Shi (Author), Yongyue Wei (Author), Yuantao Hao (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: BMC, 2024-07-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.
• Notes: 10.1186/s41256-024-00367-w; 2397-0642
• Keywords: Delphi method; Performance evaluation; CDC; Public health; Index system; Public aspects of medicine; RA1-1270
• Source: Global Health Research and Policy, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2024)

Abstract Background The performance evaluation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is crucial for enhancing the quality of public health services. With the ongoing reform of the CDC system in China, the existing performance evaluation system faces challenges. This study used the Delphi method to develop a new performance evaluation system for China's provincial, city, and county-level CDC. Methods Following the "Structure-Process-Outcome" model, assessment indicators were systematically collected. Indicators were modified and screened through two Delphi rounds based on CDC responsibilities, health development, and national policies. Twenty-four experts provided ratings and recommendations, and the research team evaluated questionnaire reliability, expert positivity, expert authority, and opinion consistency. Results The preliminary index system identified through the literature review and pre-survey included 11 primary, 30 secondary, and 64 tertiary indicators. After the first round of consultation, two secondary indicators and 11 tertiary indicators were removed and 22 tertiary indicators were added. After the second round of consultation, three secondary indicators and 11 tertiary indicators were removed and three tertiary indicators were added, at which point the p-value of the test for Kendall's coefficient of concordance W was < 0.001 and the coefficient of variation was within acceptable limits (< 0.25), so the consultation was concluded. The final index system included 11 primary, 25 secondary, and 67 tertiary indicators. Conclusions This study responded to the CDC system reform by developing a comprehensive performance evaluation index system for provincial, city, and county-level CDC in China. The index system is both scientifically grounded and practical, serving as an effective tool for promoting the high-quality work of CDC organizations.