Electronic Versus Traditional Data Collection: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Perioperative Pain Trial
Background: Electronic data collection is increasingly available as a means to collect pain-related clinical trial data; however, effectiveness and costs relative to traditional data collection are uncertain. Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate data quality, protocol adherence, satisfaction,...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | James S. Khan (Author), Lindsay A. Jibb (Author), Jason W. Busse (Author), Ian Gilron (Author), Stephen Choi (Author), James E. Paul (Author), Michael McGillion (Author), Sean Mackey (Author), D. Norman Buckley (Author), Shun Fu Lee (Author), P. J. Devereaux (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group,
2019-07-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Electronic Data Capture Versus Conventional Data Collection Methods in Clinical Pain Studies: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by: Jibb, Lindsay A, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Machine Learning-Based Early Warning Systems for Clinical Deterioration: Systematic Scoping Review
by: Muralitharan, Sankavi, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Response to "Winner of the Ronald Melzack - Canadian Journal of Pain 2021 Paper of the Year Award"
by: Jason W. Busse, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Machine Learning Approaches for the Image-Based Identification of Surgical Wound Infections: Scoping Review
by: Juan Pablo Tabja Bortesi, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Collecting verbal autopsies: improving and streamlining data collection processes using electronic tablets
by: Abraham D. Flaxman, et al.
Published: (2018)