Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of interventions addressing caregiver distress and burden among cancer caregivers

Objective: Informal caregivers (ICs) are vital to supportive cancer care and assisting cancer patients, but this caregiving burden is associated with significant distress. While addressing caregiving, it is important to explore if the caregivers are receiving care they need. Evaluating interventions...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Trupti Dhumal (Author), Zasim Azhar Siddiqui (Author), George A. Kelley (Author), Felicity Harper (Author), Kimberly M. Kelly (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_834d2c9ae7fd438c94e9fcb554c08fd8
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Trupti Dhumal  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Zasim Azhar Siddiqui  |e author 
700 1 0 |a George A. Kelley  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Felicity Harper  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kimberly M. Kelly  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of interventions addressing caregiver distress and burden among cancer caregivers 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2772-6282 
500 |a 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100145 
520 |a Objective: Informal caregivers (ICs) are vital to supportive cancer care and assisting cancer patients, but this caregiving burden is associated with significant distress. While addressing caregiving, it is important to explore if the caregivers are receiving care they need. Evaluating interventions that address burden and distress is integral to targeting ICs needs. This study evaluated interventions addressing IC burden and distress. Methods: Randomized control trials (RCT) assessing interventions for IC burden and distress and exploring supportive care as an adjunct to the intervention were included. Six electronic databases were searched in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines through October 2021. Effect sizes were estimated, and risk of bias was assessed. Results: Of 678 studies, 11 were included. Most ICs were spouses, females, and white. Interventions included educational programs, cognitive behavioral treatment, and a telephone support program. Five studies utilized behavioral theories and seven included supportive care. Pooled results showed no significant effect on reducing caregiver distress (ES, -0.26, p<0.001). Conclusions: Caring for the caregiver with interventions for reducing burden and distress are not efficacious. Innovative, well-designed, more pragmatic RCTs are needed. Innovation: This study exclusively focused on interventions and supportive care needs for reducing distress and burden among cancer ICs. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Cancer 
690 |a Caregiver distress 
690 |a Caregiver burden 
690 |a Interventions 
690 |a Supportive care 
690 |a Systematic reviews 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n PEC Innovation, Vol 2, Iss , Pp 100145- (2023) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628223000250 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2772-6282 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/834d2c9ae7fd438c94e9fcb554c08fd8  |z Connect to this object online.