Comparison of the effect of surfactant administration during nasal continuous positive airway pressure with that of nasal continuous positive airway pressure alone on respiratory distress syndrome
Background. The American Academy of Pediatrics states that prophylactic surfactant is no longer advised when continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is frequently used to stabilize preterm newborns and where the rate of prenatal corticosteroid is high. On the other hand, the European Consensus Gu...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Ameer Isam Al Aasam (Author), Ruqeya Mohammed Obeyis (Author), Qasim Mohammed Hashim (Author), Jasim Mohammed Hashim (Author), Alaa Jumaah Manji Nasrawi (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Zaslavsky O.Yu.,
2024-09-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Comparison of the Effect of Surfactant Administration During Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure with that of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Alone on Complications of Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study
by: Maryam Nakhshab, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Effects of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Cerebral Hemodynamics in Preterm Infants
by: Han Zhou, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs. Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation as Initial Treatment After Birth in Extremely Preterm Infants
by: Yasemin Ezgi Kostekci, et al.
Published: (2022) -
A Comparison between Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation in the Treatment of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome
by: Ahmad Shah Farhat, et al.
Published: (2015) -
How to choose between high-flow nasal cannula, continuous positive airway pressure, and bilevel positive airway pressure in children with acute respiratory illness
by: R Karthik Narayanan, et al.
Published: (2023)