Discounting health gain: a different view

ABSTRACTAt least since the Age of Enlightenment, good health has been a tenet for society. Healthy societies could learn better, work harder, improve their wealth, and live longer. Today societies focus on life expectancy, as we value long and healthy lives. As illustrated by the provision of COVID-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Baudouin Standaert (Author), Olivier Ethgen (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Taylor & Francis Group, 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_83bb029584f1454d99937e75bc1dec22
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Baudouin Standaert  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Olivier Ethgen  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Discounting health gain: a different view 
260 |b Taylor & Francis Group,   |c 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1080/20016689.2023.2275350 
500 |a 2001-6689 
520 |a ABSTRACTAt least since the Age of Enlightenment, good health has been a tenet for society. Healthy societies could learn better, work harder, improve their wealth, and live longer. Today societies focus on life expectancy, as we value long and healthy lives. As illustrated by the provision of COVID-19 vaccines first for the elderly, societies value life-saving actions. Paradoxically, health economic assessments conventionally devalue long-lasting health through the practice of discounting health benefits along with costs. However, health, with its intrinsic and instrumental characteristics, is not synonymous with money cash, a tradeable asset that devalues with time. If improving healthy life expectancy is a societal ambition, it seems counter-intuitive to value future health less as a result of an artificial mathematical construct when evaluating economically new medical interventions. In this paper, we investigate the application of discounting health in healthcare and consider paradoxical findings, especially in relation to disease prevention with vaccination. We argue that there is no economically sustainable argument to discount health gains, except for the benefit of the payer with a goal of spending less on life-saving products. If that is the objective for discounting health, there are other means to achieve the same goal in a more transparent and simpler way. From the long-term perspective of healthcare development, not discounting health gains would encourage research that values long-term effects. This in turn has the potential to benefit the investor, the payer, and the patient/consumer, improving the situation from multiple perspectives. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Discounting 
690 |a health 
690 |a economic assessment 
690 |a vaccination 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
690 |a Business 
690 |a HF5001-6182 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Market Access & Health Policy, Vol 11, Iss 1 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/20016689.2023.2275350 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2001-6689 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/83bb029584f1454d99937e75bc1dec22  |z Connect to this object online.